Answer:
1. Well known
Holding an elected office, whether it’s a Senator or local PTA President, bestows upon the owner a certain amount of prominence among their constituents. When it comes time to vote, name recognition is one of the primary benefits of incumbency, especially in more obscure races. This association is often enough to overcome challenges from more obscure rivals.
2. Institutional Support
By running from within the system, officials can use many of the advantages that come with their office. Interest groups and other supporters are much more likely to get behind someone with a proven track record of responding to their needs than an unknown challenger. Also, there are many tools and resources available to office holders through the system of support behind the organization, like voter databases as well as contact information, that can be used to their advantage.
3. Fund Raising
Connections with powerful constituencies and the power to influence decisions on their behalf often allows incumbents to raise far more money than those who are working from outside the system. Historical precedent and data confirms that elected officials are often able to out raise and spend their opponents in races that require fund raising.
Explanation:
Answer:
The Bolsheviks defeated anti-Communists because their actions were approved by the people and they were supported by the military.
Explanation:
The Russian Revolution of 1917 was one of the volatile political protests of the century. The result of this protest resulted in the uprooting of the Romanov Dynasty and czarist rule.
The Bolsheviks were led by Vladimir Lenin and were successful in driving out the imperial dynasty. After the Russian Revolt of 1917, the Russian Civil War began in 1918 in which anti-Bolsheviks (White and anti-Communist) stood against Bolsheviks (Reds and Communists). The Bolsheviks were able to defeat Whites as they have already become popular amongst them because of the Russian Revolution of 1917 and were backed up by the military.
Answer:
D is correct option.
Explanation:
Both Developed and developing had significant impact on the environment, but the trend is changing now. The developed countries were the first ones to industrialize during eighteenth and nineteenth century, nut now the developing countries are on the same path. Rich nations are displacing environmental damage to developing countries. Developed countries transfers the process of production to countries like china, and with this shift the carbon footprint of the developing countries increase, while that of developed ones decrease.
Answer:
In 1833, Jackson retaliated against the bank by removing federal government deposits and placing them in "pet" state banks. But as the economy overheated and so did state dreams of infrastructure projects. Congress passed a law in 1836 that required the federal surplus to be distributed to the states in four payments.
Explanation:
