I say Israel - and I hope this is taken in an utterly nonpartisan way, which takes absolutely no position vis-a-vis the legitimacy of either conservatism or the Israeli state. I just think some core aspects of Israeli government and society are in line with mainstream US conservatism: a free-market liberal democracy of course, but with formal religious-ethnic affiliation, compulsory military service with training on firearms (and licensing to possess same) for all citizens, and a generally hawkish stance on questions of military and defense. They are also highly security-oriented, some would say in a much more effective way than the US government, and its security apparatus employs profiling techniques which almost undoubtedly have a racial component (<span>and </span><span>conservatives would no doubt want to insist that these two facts are directly related). I believe that taxation rates are roughly on par with that in the US, if not a bit less... though not nearly as low as Switzerland. </span>
yes, mostly for men tho. i hope that is correct
answer:
new england was ideal for the development for factories because the ppor soil caused people to leave their farms, to find work, river provided water power to run machinery, easily accessible ports for passage, proximity to resources.
explanation:
The correct answer is that yes, they advise on rules and legislation and file briefs with the courts. They lobby with the legislative and the executive powers to change laws or implement new measures, while they file briefs with courts as a part of the judicial branch. A brief is when they write a document giving their opinion as to why a side should win in a case.
Hancock claimed to have invented vulcanization independently, and received a British patent, initiated in 1843, but finalized in 1844.
