2. Relationship-enhancing.
Distress-maintaining is an attribution that places more responsibility on people for their negative behaviours and less on their positive behaviours. (Ex. Sue’s husband must have forgotten because he doesn’t care about her.) So not this one.
Relationship-enhancing is the opposite. More responsibility for positive and less for negative. (Ex. Sue’s husband is late to their dinner and it must have been the traffic, not his time-management skills.) This is correct.
Observe-biased (aka fundamental attribution error or actor observer bias) is the tendency to judge other people’s behaviour by their personality and your own behaviour by external factors. (Ex. That man honked the horn three times because he’s an angry person but I kicked my desk because my reports were accidentally shredded.) Not this one.
I don’t quite know what insecure attribution is but I believe it is feeling more insecure about yourself when you attribute something to you instead of to external factors. Don’t trust me completely on this one, but I don’t think this is correct.
The answer is illustrators.
Have a nice day!
Answer:
Peripheral Nervous System
Explanation:
The Somatic Nervous system transmit sensory and motor signals to and from the Central Nervous system.
Answer:
- be international
- consider multiple viewpoints
- deal with multiple uses for resources
Explanation:
When we are talking about European solutions for environmental issues, we have to <u>make sure they are international </u>- <u>the continent of Europe consists of many different countries, which is why the solution had to be able to affect different international countries and their policies.</u>
It is for that reason why it has to consider <u>various viewpoints</u>.<u> Different countries have different problems and ideas, and they all should be taken into account in order to get the best solution for the various environmental issues.</u>
This is also connected to the third statement - <u>the solution has to deal with multiple uses for resource</u>s, as they are all affected by environmental issues and they are all in danger. <u>The solution should look into the resources see which ones are the most sustainable and effective in the wake of the climate changes, and put the accent on them, while at the same time trying to preserve other resources that are endangered, </u>
<span>The Challenger disaster is a classic example of group think because some of the people involved knew that the shuttle was not safe to launch but chose to not speak up because they did not want to disrupt the group cohesion.</span>