1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
liubo4ka [24]
4 years ago
15

Summarize the three main effects of third parties on American politics

History
2 answers:
Ahat [919]4 years ago
8 0

Answer: A

Explanation:

because

Shtirlitz [24]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The three main consequences of holding a third party of politics in the United States is firstly they could rarely succeed in any elections.

Secondly, When campaigns carried in the United States,  third-party substitute the public interest from certain issues which can be very serious. Thirdly , they usually take away votes from the nominees of the influential parties which affects the entire results of the elections.

You might be interested in
Suppose you walk into the Capitol in Washington and ask to interview the most prominent person in the entire congress. If they a
bezimeni [28]

The correct answer is B

Congress has two houses: the senate and the house of representatives. The Answer A, president pro tempore of the Senate is wrong- this person is not even the most important person in senate, only the second most important. In fact the highest person in the senate is the Vice President of the United States. On the other hand, the highest person in the house of representatives is the Speaker of the House. So we know it's either B or D.  Now, the question is tricky, as neither of the chambers of the senate is officially more importnat. Additionally vice-president is higher in the line to the succession to the President's office.

However, it is usually assumed that the Speaker represents the Congress as a whole, and that's why i'd go with B.

3 0
4 years ago
Why did it take the states so long to ratify the Articles of Confederation
Marizza181 [45]
The reason why it takes a long time to ratify the Articles of Confederation is that U.S. just declared independent from Britain, in other words, they just passed the Declaration of Independence, and in order to keep a country on track, they need some sorts of form of government, and they don't want to repeating the history, or have another tyrant, or a king, to rule over them again, which is a part of reason why they declared independent (the actual reasons is the king taxes us for no reason and we can't participate in the government), so they need all of the 13 states to approve, or sign, the Articles of Confederation, majority of them signed it, some of them having issues about the rights in the Articles of Confederation, so someone, I forgot his name, promised to includes all of the rights into the Articles of Confederation, which they can't do it instantly, which later known as the Bill of Rights (the first 10 amendments), so it takes longer to get the whole Articles of Confederation to be approved, or ratified.

Hope this help, my English is not that well so please excuse for it.

8 0
3 years ago
How did humanity start?
Virty [35]

Answer:

Since there are two side to this both the religious side and scientific people believe different things depending on your religion it would be different since different religions believe different things so for example Christians would believe God created Adam and Eve and then things went from there whereas scientist would believe Modern humans originated in Africa within the past 200,000 years and evolved from their most likely recent common ancestor, Homo erectus, which means 'upright man' in Latin. Homo erectus is an extinct species of human that lived between 1.9 million and 135,000 years ago.  

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Did your opinion reflect the majority or minority opinion on each case?
dangina [55]
Majority is the answer
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
4)
serious [3.7K]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

The nullification crisis was a conflict between the U.S. state of South Carolina and the federal government of the United States in 1832–33. ... Calhoun, who opposed the federal imposition of the tariffs of 1828 and 1832 and argued that the U.S. Constitution gave states the right to block the enforcement of a federal law.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the goal of assimilation?
    8·1 answer
  • During which stage of pregnancy does the fetus develop its body structures and system ?
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements about the importance of the financial market is
    15·2 answers
  • List these events in chronological order:
    13·1 answer
  • HEEEEELP PLEEEEASE!! I DONT REMEMEBER THIS SUBJECT AND I DONT HAVE TIME TO GO OVER IT BECAUSE I HAVE TO GO IN A FEW MINUTES! PLS
    13·1 answer
  • Which country in southeast asia was able to resist western colonial rule and why
    6·1 answer
  • I WILL GIVE OUT GOOD RATINGS AND BRAINLY!!!!!! PLZ HELP AND I WILL GIVE YOU GOOD LUCK!!!!!!! FOR 5 DAYS!!! ;)
    5·2 answers
  • What thing did southern state do to prevent it from being effective
    6·1 answer
  • What event occurred in Tiananmen Square in 1989? A) A Communist group led its followers to the Square and took Mao Zedong hostag
    10·1 answer
  • What does this Greek vessel (pottery) teach us about the beliefs of the ancient Greeks? Answer In a Paragraph
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!