If an immigrant commits a major crime in the the country they moved to they should be sent back. This is because the country they moved to shouldn't have to put up with other country's criminals.
The true statement here is C. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights lists human rights for everyone, universally. =)
Refer to this link for the complete question: brainly.com/question/11018884
As I answered before, when a world war has just finished, the country's resources are depleted. So, it is difficult to provide jobs and houses for returning soldiers because these would require manpower and monetary resources. The period after the war is dedicated to picking up the scrap and trying to make do with what's available through cooperation. So, for me, the most appropriate course of action is helping labor unions work together with businesses.
Answer:
The correct answer is <u><em>B) Oversimplifications often ignore complex or contradictory evidence</em></u>
Explanation:
History is not always easy to study and the further we go back, the further we have to rely on second hand or third hand sources.
For example, in order to study something that happened 20 years ago is fairly easy since it would be recorded either in newspapers, books, or even video.
However, it is not always easy to draw conclusions when we are studying an event that took place 2,000 years ago.
Most of them times we rely on information passed on from generations before until finally someone wrote it down.
While many historians get tempted to Over-simply an event to draw certain conclusions, this should not be practiced as it creates a bias and forces us to study or even research for contradictory evidence. Sometimes, this contradictory evidence can completely change our understanding of the event.
