Answer:
a.
Date Account Title Debit Credit
Feb. 20 Cash $174,800
Common stock $144,000
Paid-In Cap. in excess of par $30,800
<u>Working</u>
Common stock = 18,000 * 8
= $144,000
Paid-in cap. = 174,800 - 144,000
= $30,800
b.
Date Account Title Debit Credit
Feb. 20 Cash $174,800
Common stock $174,800
c.
Date Account Title Debit Credit
Feb. 20 Cash $174,800
Common stock $72,000
Paid-In Cap. in excess of par $102,000
<u>Working</u>
Common stock = 4 * 18,000 = $72,000
Paid in cap = 174,000 - 72,000 = $102,000
Answer: Residential interior and architectural design contribute towards housing evolution by building and designing the houses.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Architectures are one who works on the structure of the house. They decide what should be the structure of the house. But the residential interior designers, on the other hand, look after the interior of the house. They decorate the house from inside.
Both of them play a very important role in housing evolution. Houses have developed a lot due to the work done by interiors and architectures. Today a large number of houses are seen in urban areas with all the modern amenities.
Answer:
Answer for the question:
There are ten polluting firms, Firm1,. . . ,Firm10. Each firm emits 100 pounds of pollution prior to any regulations (so there are currently 1,000 pounds being emitted). Each firm has constant marginal abatement costs, but the costs vary across firms. Conveniently, the firms’ names indicate their marginal abatement costs. Firm1’s marginal abatement costs are constant at $1 per pound, Firm2’s marginal abatement costs are constant at $2 per pound,. . . , and Firm10’s marginal abatement costs are $10 per pound.
a. Suppose the regulator wants to achieve a 25% reduction in pollution (250 pounds). What is the cost effective allocation of emis- sions across the ten firms?
b. What are the total abatement costs for society to achieve a 250 pound reduction in emissions?
c. The marginal damage of pollution in this city is given by MD= 4-1/250 X, where X is the total reduction in pollution. What is the optimal level of pollution?
is given in the attachment.
Explanation:
Answer: $2.1 million
Explanation:
It is mentioned the project is independent of the outcome of general market which means that
=> beta = 0
Using the CAPM formula which is,
r=rt + B* (rm -rf)
=> r = 3% + 0*(12%-3%) = 3%
Expected value of Project in one year = $1 billions * 0.1
Expected value of Project in one year = $100 millions
NPV = Expected value of Project in one year/ (1 + 0.03) - Initial cost
NPV = 100/ (1 + 0.03) - 95
NPV = 97.1 - 95
NPV = $2.1 million
