1. In the criminal justice system, John can temporarily put Jack in custody pending the arrival of the police. Jack was not detained for a period longer than five minutes and not for a civil wrong.
Thus, in this lawsuit for the tort of unlawful imprisonment, Jack will lose because he committed a crime. He cannot apply a civil law to a criminal case.
2. Adriana is correct that her personal assets cannot be reached in this lawsuit brought by the shareholders of DEF, Inc. because SLA Accountants, LLP is a limited liability partnership and not just an ordinary partnership.
A limited liability partnership, like a limited liability company, offers members limited liability. However, the shareholders of DEF, Inc. may decide to sue Adriana personally.
3. Andrew is wrong because the car handed over by Sam was not a completed inter-vivos gift. The transfer was not absolute but conditional upon Sam not returning from the Middle East.
As a conditional transfer of gift, the vesting of the ownership interest created by the transfer depends on the fulfillment of a condition.
Thus, since the transfer condition did not materialize, Andrew should return the car to Sam in good faith.
Learn more about inter vivos gifts and limited liability partnerships here brainly.com/question/14767795 and brainly.com/question/1166757
Answer:100
Explanation:
The following information can be gotten from the question:
Cost for 10 sofas = $2500
Cost for 12 sofas = $2760.
Average Cost = Total Cost/Quantity
2500 / 10 = $250 and
$2760 / 12 = $230
The average cost for 12 sofas will be $230
Marginal cost is the change in total cost divided by the change in quantity. This will be:
= ( 2760 - 2500 )/( 12 - 10 )
= 260/2
= 130
The difference between the average cost per sofa for 12 sofas and the marginal cost of the 12th sofa will be:
=230 - 130
= 100
Answer:
a respondent’s reason for not buying a particular product that was sent in the mail as a sample
Explanation:
Why are all these questions so hard I don’t know the answer
Answer:
One of the great dangers in allocating common fixed corporate costs is that such allocations can make a product line look less profitable than it really is.
Explanation:
Therefore, care must be exercised so that a product line is not eliminated because the common fixed costs have been allocated to it such that it becomes unprofitable. This is why it is necessary to identify activity cost pools into which such fixed costs can be accumulated and from which they can be allocated to product lines. Using ABC costing approach, for instance, offers a means of escape because the system tries to allocate costs based on the level of usage or consumption of such common costs by each product line instead of using arbitrary allocation formulas.