I’ll give you two:
Yes: The “War” on the Indians was not a traditional war of declaration but of skirmishes. When wagon trains of people headed West Indians would commonly target them for raids and pillage, so along many routes forts where built and patrols would try and make sure they were safe. If the problem became worse the local garrison would find the tribe and come with a list of demands. Most of the time they were fired upon arrival out of fear or anger. This would lead to a small battle or skirmish which would likely cause collateral damage.
No: The wars raged in the west against the Indians were that of near genocide, and to call it anything but is misleading. To claim that the slaughter of hundreds of innocent people was a “battle” is absurd and shouldn’t be considered. Though in films that depict such events are dramatized and inaccurate, situations much like those were taking place around the west yearly.
Answer:
<em>The correct answer is C.)</em>
Explanation:
<em>Edge 2020 i hope yall all have a good day! </em>
<em></em>
<em></em>
<em>the national ky hotline </em>
(800)-273-8255 <em>help is available so take it and love yourself</em>
Answer:
The Phoenicians created the first alphabet
Explanation:
The development of banking during commercial revolution in western Europe was significant because it allowed for the creation of private and public credit--meaning that much larger ventures could be started due to an increase of capital, which allowed people to take bigger risks.
Because slaves did all the work white people felt like the didnt have to do so slaves did all the work
