He was elected unanimously and had the universal respect of the country. This shows we he ended up being loved by everyone by being a great president.
Hope this helps :)
<em>Well, for one... Louis the XVI was considerd ineffectual because he was usually depicted as rather a weak sort of king. Not really able to wield the strong centralized state in which his ancestors had crafted.</em>
<em> *And he was also seen as an honest man, who had good intensions, but who was most likely unfit for the strong task of reforming the monarchy; He basically wasnt the best man for the job... </em>
<span><em>~Therefore, He was ineffectual, just like the question states...
</em><em>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~</em>
<em>~Hope this helped! Anymore questions, please feel free to ask. :)</em></span>
<span>Radical republicans in congress wanted to provide more rights for formerly enslaved people, so they "resisted" efforts in Congress to end Reconstruction early by pulling out Union troops from the South. </span>
Running the army
The Assembly does have the duty of passing laws, acting as supreme court and choosing generals for the navy. However, the assembly does not have the duty to run the army. This specifical duty is upon the president, as he is the chief of the army in charge, while the Assembly has more legislative power than executive.
He formed standard oil in 1870 it was so complete the opponets labeled it the Cleveland Massacre
