Answer:
a. Graph A: Cost vs Volume
Graph B: Calories vs Volume
b. Graph B (Calories vs Volume)
c. k = 15
Step-by-step explanation:
a. It is not possible for a volume of 10 oz of drink to be sold for $150. It doesn't make common sense. Also, calorie level of 150 in 10 oz of drink seem plausible.
It makes more sense if 10 oz of the drink cost $3.75. Therefore, the graphs should be titled as follows:
Graph A: Cost vs Volume
Graph B: Calories vs Volume
b. The quantities in Graph B (Calories vs Volume) appear to be in a proportional relationship. We know this because if we try drawing a line to connect the points on the graph, it will give us a straight line. A straight line connotes proportionality.
Also the ratio of the quantities of the two known points given are the same. I.e.
Therefore the quantities compared in Graph B shows a proportional relationship.
c. Constant of proportionality =
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
on day 1 she reads - 25 pages
on day 2 she reads - 35 pages
on day 3 she reads - 45 pages
on day 4 she reads - 55 pages
on day 5 she reads - 65 pages
on day 6 she reads - 75 pages
Answer
Find out the how much people were at the wedding.
To prove
Let us assume that the people were at the wedding be x .
As given
Joy organised a large wedding .
Guests had to choose their meals from beaf ,chicken or vegetarian .
69 people chose vegetarian .
Than the equation becomes
L.C.M of (3,12) = 12
than
12x = 69 × 12 + 4x + 5x
12x - 9x = 828
3x = 828
x = 276
Therefore 276 people were at the wedding.
<em><u>Answer:</u></em>
145.309
<em><u>Step-by-step explanation:</u></em>
So we want to find the midpoint of the two number: 145.809 and 144.809, what we want to do it to find the difference between the two numbers and then divide it by 2 so we can find the halfway point:
145.809 - 144.809 = 1
^ So from this, we just have to add half of 1 or 0.5 to the smaller number:
144.809 + 0.5 = 145.309
Answer:
If then
Step-by-step explanation:
If a syllogism is a kind of logical arguement then it applies to deductive reasoning to arrive at a conclusion based on two or more propositions