The excerpt from the President Clinton states claims about the growth of the economy of the country.
Answer: Option B.
<u>Explanation:</u>
During the time when the President of the United States of America was Clinton, there was a lot of growth in the economy of the country. The level of unemployment in the country was at the lowest level, there were huge employment opportunities in the country.
The crime rate in the country was at the lowest level and a lot of people were opting for higher education and aid was provided to those people. Children had health insurance and people had moved out of poverty. All this claims that the growth of the country had touched heights during that time.
Answer:
She explains to him that he has an upper hand in the situation (knowing that Jack was saying bad things about him). She then tells him that if he refuses to go back to school on his own, she'll tell their parents who will tell the school principle and that everyone will start treating him like a freak that needs to go to a special needs school. That is ultimately what makes up his mind to go back.
Answer:
The correct answer is option D.
Explanation:
He is shown to be a powerful man capable of abusing the power he has.
Is a man characterized by being physically imposing and muscular.
It has a "<em>cruel body</em>" that shows an air of power and aggression.
He takes advantage of both his physical and mental hardness and uses that gross personality in conjunction with violence, to keep everything under control.
Answer:If the story were told from John's perspective, it would be a much more detached view of the narrator's descent into madness. Although the readers do not know what John thinks, it is clear that he believes that the medical treatment is correct. Not only would his perspective add another dimension to the woman's madness, but it would make him a more sympathetic character and perhaps even make their love story more tragic.
Who does Gilman ultimately blame for the narrator's descent into madness? Why?
In some ways, Gilman can seem to blame both John and S. Weir Mitchell for the narrator's ultimate insanity. Although they both mean well, their decision to promote the "rest cure" treatment is certainly the catalyst for the narrator's mental break. However, at the same time, Gilman could blame the society of the time, a society that expected women to be perfect wives and mothers and nothing else.
What is the significance of the first-person perspective of the narrative?
The first-person perspective of the narrative is very important because it allows the reader to understand and experience the narrator's descent into madness on a personal level. Instead of discovering the narrator's insanity from the detached perspective of a third-person narrator, the reader is present in the narrator's head at every stage of her insanity. As a result, the story is much more powerful and ultimately more disconcerting.
Explanation: