Answer:
The potential of additional regional currencies such as the euro is very important, and for this reason, many economists support the idea. In fact, John Maynard Keynes, one of the most influential economists in history, once proposed not a regional common currency, but a common global currency.
The potential lies in the fact that regional currencies allow to coordinate a common monetary policy in several countries. This common policy means that several countries now have the same interest rates, the same rate of inflation, and the same currency itself, and all these commonalities facilitate the exchange of goods and services.
While the Euro has had drawbacks since its inception, the Euro has survived, and is now one of the strongest curriencies in the world.
If you support the concept, should those currencies be tied to regional economic blocs?
I support the concept, and I agree that they should be tied to regional economic bloc. It would not be very effective to adopt a common currency for countries that are not economically integrated in other areas.
Answer:
The 1-year HPR for the second stock is <u>12.84</u>%. The stock that will provide the better annualized holding period return is <u>Stock 1</u>.
Explanation:
<u>For First stock </u>
Total dividend from first stock = Dividend per share * Number quarters = $0.32 * 2 = $0.64
HPR of first stock = (Total dividend from first stock + (Selling price after six months - Initial selling price per share)) / Initial selling price = ($0.64 + ($31.72 - $27.85)) / $27.85 = 0.1619, or 16.19%
Annualized holding period return of first stock = HPR of first stock * Number 6 months in a year = 16.19% * 2 = 32.38%
<u>For Second stock </u>
Total dividend from second stock = Dividend per share * Number quarters = $0.67 * 4 = $2.68
Since you expect to sell the stock in one year, we have:
Annualized holding period return of second stock = The 1-year HPR for the second stock = (Total dividend from second stock + (Selling price after six months - Initial selling price per share)) / Initial selling price = ($2.68+ ($36.79 - $34.98)) / $34.98 = 0.1284, or 12.84%
Since the Annualized holding period return of first stock of 32.38% is higher than the Annualized holding period return of second stock of 12.84%. the first stock will provide the better annualized holding period return.
The 1-year HPR for the second stock is <u>12.84</u>%. The stock that will provide the better annualized holding period return is <u>Stock 1</u>.
Answer:
The answer is option (c)$89,301
Explanation:
Solution
Given that:
Inflation rate = 2%
The expected value of an investment = 82,500
Now,
nominal terminal value of the investment at the end of year 4.
Thus,
The nominal terminal value rate at the end of year four is given as follows:
= 82, 500 * (1 +2%) ^4
=$89300. 65
= $89,301
Answer:
She needs $150,000 to fund this perpetuity.
Explanation:
In this question we need to find the present value of this perpetuity. Because this is a growing perpetuity we will need to use the formula of present value of a growing perpetuity.
PV of growing perpetuity = Payment/ R-G
The payment is the current payment the perpetuity will pay which is 6,000, R is the interest rate which is 10% and G is the growth rate of the perpetuity which is 6%. Now we will input these values in the formula in order to find the present value of the perpetuity.
6,000/0.1-0.06
=6,000/0.04
=150,000
Answer: LG needs to be aware of the implications around leasing her property or to selling off out rightly.
whether A sale or lease happens between her and the company /individual who wants to buy over or make use of the property. So she cannot ignore the legal formalities and report the transaction as a lease.
Explanation:
