TAYLOR'S CONSTANT NEED FOR CONTROL IS A SYMPTOM OF OCD.<span />
Answer:
1. In<u>ductive argument</u>.
2. <u>Inductive argument.</u>
3. <u>Deductve argument.</u>
Explanation:
1. This argument is inductive. The conclusion is a generalization, that is drawn by a premise, the premise has been obtained out of experimentation.
If two grains of sand have diamons, it doesn´t mean the entire beach is made of them. This argument is not strong because the conclusion is not accurate.
2. This is a deductive argument. This type of argument depends on the logic struture of it. If the premise were to be true, the conclusion would be true also.
It is not a sound argument, because thanksgiving happends every fourth thursday of november. It is an invalid argument because the premise is false, there for the concusion is false.
3. This is an invalid deductive argument. The premise is incorrect, so the conclusion that is being deduce from it is also wrong. It is not a sound argument because if you double the length of the sides of a square, the area would quatriple.
Answer:
Interdependent.
Explanation:
An interdependent person, due to the emphasis on relationships and groups (their social lives, basically) is one in which the self is embedded in their said social lives, just like in the example: the exercise describes a person, Urie, who is always aware of what people do around him. Therefore, he adjusts to them, suppressing his own preferences and desires.
Louisiana purchase
Purchase of Alaska from Russia
Mexican American war