Answer:
Maximum amount that can be given to family (including the sons- and daughters-in-law) without using unified transfer tax credit is $390,000.
Explanation:
Given the data in the question;
Nathan and Diana are married and they have 3 married children, meaning Nathan and Diana also have 3 daughters/sons in law married to their children. In addition, they have 7 minor grand children.
Number of donees will be ⇒ 3 + 3 + 7 = 13
Now, we know that; The annual gift tax exclusion for 2019-2020 is $15,000 per donee or individual for every tax payer while that of married couple is $30,000.
Meaning Nathan and Diana can give $30,000as a gift to each of their family members without using any of their unified transfer tax credit.
Hence,
Maximum amount that can be given to family (including the sons- and daughters-in-law) without using unified transfer tax credit will be;
⇒ 13 × $30,000
= $390,000.
Tab Color.........................
Answer:
A
Explanation:
This is because it allows the respondent indicate the intensity of his or her feelings by using the agree-disagree response continuum position according to the Likert survey rating scale.
Question Completion:
Matrix payoff:
Sharon
Left Right
Paolo Left 8, 3 4, 4
Right 5, 3 5, 4
Answer:
The only dominant strategy in this game is for ___Paolo______ to choose ____Right______.
The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Paolo chooses ____Right______ and Sharon chooses __ Right_____.
Explanation:
a) Paolo's dominant strategy is the strategy that always provides the greater utility to Paolo, no matter what Sharon's strategy is. In this case, the dominant strategy for Paolo is to choose RIGHT always.
b) The Nash Equilibrium concept determines the optimal solution in a non-cooperative game in which each player (e.g. Paolo and Sharon) lacks any incentive to change their initial strategies. This implies that each player can achieve their desired outcomes by not deviating from their initial strategies since each player's strategy is optimal when considering the decisions of the other player.
Answer:
so near its maturity that it presents insignificant risk of changes in interest rates.
Explanation:
As we know that the cash equivalent i.e .short term and also classified as the highly liquid investment that is always ready to convert into the cash amount i.e. near to its maturity also at the same time it represent the non-significant changes risk with respective to the rate of interest
Therefore the last option is correct
