1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sweet [91]
3 years ago
11

The war of roses was a dispute over the english throne by the lancasters and the yorks.

History
1 answer:
Kobotan [32]3 years ago
7 0

Yes, the above statement is true.

The war of roses was a dispute over the English throne by the Lancaster’s and the Yorks. 

The final victory went to Henry Tudor, a claimant of Lancastrian party, Henry defeats the Yorkist forces and when Richard is killed, Henry comes to rule and successfully ending the Wars of the Roses. This is called the war of roses because the emblem of the Yorkists was a white rose and the emblem of Lancastrians was a red rose.

You might be interested in
TRUE or FALSE- The “Battle of San Antonio de Bexar” was where the Texians defeated the Mexican army, sending back General Coz re
shutvik [7]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

Battle of San Jacinto, (April 21, 1836), defeat of a Mexican army of about 1,200–1,300 men under Antonio López de Santa Anna by about 900 men (mostly recent American arrivals in Texas) led by Gen. Sam Houston

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP ASAP!!
Nookie1986 [14]

Answer:

.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
How were the abolitionist movement and the Underground Railroad linked?
Yuliya22 [10]
The abolitionists helped get slaves to safety in the north using the underground railroad
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Was the dropping of the atomic bomb justified ( pls answer with 200 words or more if possible)
Andrei [34K]
<h3>The dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was justified at the time as being moral – in order to bring about a more rapid victory and prevent the deaths of more Americans. However, it was clearly not moral to use this weapon knowing that it would kill civilians and destroy the urban milieu.</h3>

<h2>please mark in brain list </h2>

7 0
2 years ago
Why would the American people consider executive orders both good and bad for their government
Kruka [31]

Good: Things get done! Things getting done are good.

Bad: It circumvents the system. While things getting done are good, it is bad when the system doesn't work and a workaround is needed.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are some thing Rome
    7·1 answer
  • What is the key constitutional clause that lies behind most of the implied powers of congress
    12·1 answer
  • The costs of corporate crimes are estimated at $260 billion annually, about _______ times greater than the cost to victims of al
    8·1 answer
  • Plzzz help and A is not the answer but I don’t know what is the answer!!!!
    5·2 answers
  • With the quote above what is the answer?
    5·2 answers
  • What does khrushchev accuse kennedy of using to get what he wants?
    12·1 answer
  • When did a juvenile system<br> begin in Georgia?
    11·2 answers
  • A tariff is a ____<br> on _____<br> goods.
    9·1 answer
  • In 3-4 sentences, how did Mussolini come to power and maintian his power in Italy?
    5·1 answer
  • Why did a civil war begin in Russia?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!