1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nata [24]
4 years ago
7

Why did "new immigrants" have a more difficult time adapting to their new life in America than did "old immigrants"? Select all

that apply.
-The new immigrants didn't want to work for low wages.
-Many new immigrants didn't speak English.
-The new immigrants were not Protestant.
-The new immigrants weren't skilled enough to work in America.
History
1 answer:
Bond [772]4 years ago
8 0

Many new immigrants did not speak English. Since they came from different countries due to a variety of push/pull factors, they faced language barriers when trying to find work.

You might be interested in
1850: Compromise of 1850
Svetradugi [14.3K]

Answer:

The Compromise of 1850 consists of five laws passed in September of 1850 that dealt with the issue of slavery and territorial expansion. ... As part of the Compromise of 1850, the Fugitive Slave Act was amended and the slave trade in Washington, D.C., was abolished.Apr 5, 2019

Explanation:

Plz give me brainleist

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In this unit, you learned that Oklahoma experienced a great deal of change in the late
vampirchik [111]

Answer:

Explanation:The dawn of the twentieth century found the region between Kansas and Texas in transition. Once set aside as a permanent home for indigenous and uprooted American Indians, almost two million acres of Indian Territory had been opened to settlement in 1889. Joined with a strip of land above the Texas Panhandle, the two areas were designated "Oklahoma Territory" by an act of Congress the following year. Subsequent additions of land surrendered by tribal governments increased the new territory until it was roughly equal in size to the diminished Indian Territory. Land was the universal attraction, but many white pioneers who rushed into Oklahoma Territory or settled in Indian Territory hoped for a fresh start in a new Eden not dominated by wealth and corporate power. Freedmen dreamed of a new beginning in a place of social justice where rights guaranteed by the Constitution would be respected. Most Native Americans, whose land was being occupied, had come to realize the futility of their opposition to the process that would soon unite the two territories into a single state. A few Indians, most wedded to tribal traditions, simply ignored a process they could not understand and refused to participate in an allotment of land they had once been promised would be theirs "forever."

The birth of the new state occurred in an era of protest and reform. Populist and Progressive currents merged to sweep reform-minded Democrats to an overwhelming victory in 1906 in the selection of delegates to a Constitutional Convention tasked with forging Indian and Oklahoma territories and the Osage Nation into a single state. The constitution drafted at the convention in Guthrie in 1906–07 was not as "radical" as Pres. Theodore Roosevelt suggested, but it did reflect its authors' belief that the will of the people, not powerful corporations, should determine state policy. A series of provisions, including a corporation commission, popular election of many state officials, initiative and referendum, preferential balloting for U.S. senators, a single term for the governor, a weak legislature, and inclusion of details in the constitution normally enacted by statute, reflected the founding fathers' conviction that corporate influence on state government should be held in check.

5 0
3 years ago
How did the rise of large cities shape American society and politics at the turn of the 20th century?
prisoha [69]
Https://www.coursehero.com/file/19540324/largecitiesparagraphs/
4 0
3 years ago
Free market economies distribute goods and services _____ than command economies.
Luba_88 [7]
The answer for this question is B
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What powerful king united ancient Egypt?. A. Narmer. B. Tutankhamen. C. Ramses II. D. Amenhotep
Bezzdna [24]
The powerful king that united ancient egypt is : Narmer.

Before the reign of narmer, Egypt was divided into lower part and upper part Kingdom. Narmer managed to unified these two kingdoms and became the first king who rule the united ancient egypt

hope this helps
8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What words in the declaration show hat the 13 colonies are all in agreement on this
    13·1 answer
  • 3. which monarch continued to allow serfs? a) catherine the great b) frederick william ii c) charles v (spain) d) peter the grea
    9·2 answers
  • What was one of England's main goals in sending explorers to the Americas? A. conquering Dutch settlements B. blocking Spain's r
    10·2 answers
  • Which of these BEST explains why guilds had a positive effect on trade during the Middle Ages?
    9·2 answers
  • HELP
    5·1 answer
  • In the South, the SNCC and CORE organized non-violent protests such as
    7·1 answer
  • What was the importance of the meetings of the Second Continental Congress?
    14·1 answer
  • Define: Selective Servce<br>​
    9·2 answers
  • How would have things changed if alexander the great had lived to old age
    10·1 answer
  • What was the MOST likely reason that Jane Elliott's lesson on discrimination was
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!