Answer:Americans wrote, published, and read a great deal about the war as it was going on and in the years that immediately followed. This literature invested the violence and trauma of the Civil War with meaning.
Explanation:Drawing a firm line at 1865 may have had another effect as well: encouraging us to look away from literature on the war itself and on its immediate aftermath. The traditional American literary canon often skips from American Renaissance figures of the 1850s to late-century realists like Henry James and Edith Wharton. Yet Americans wrote, published, and read a great deal about the war as it was going on and in the years that immediately followed. Civil War literary culture included a wide variety of both popular and highbrow forms, from news of the frontlines to accounts of emancipation to patriotic songs and poems as well as countless works of fiction. This literature invested the violence and trauma of the Civil War with meaning. It helped Americans on both sides of the conflict make sense of the war and its effects.
The significance is because the title of it refers to the time elapsed between the moments at which the protagonist, Louise Mallard, hears that her husband is dead, then discovers that he is alive after all
Skinny and they don’t eat much so they don’t get bloated
Answer:
The answer is: his refusal to allow state governments to nullify federal law.
Explanation:
Jackson’s desire to take actions that helped the common people show that he was more similar, in terms of policy, to Jefferson, except for the <u><em>Nullification Issue.</em></u>
Jefferson first introduced the word “nullification” into American political life, on his draft of the Kentucky Resolutions of 1798.
“Nullification…is the rightful remedy” when the federal government reaches beyond its constitutional powers.
Jackson issued a Nullification Proclamation. In his proclamation, Jackson stated that Nullification of a federal law by a state was:
Incompatible with the existence of the Union, contradicted expressly by the letter of the constitution, unauthorized by its spirit, inconsistent with every principle for which it was founded, and destructive of the great object for which it was founded.
