Because women are equal people and wanted to be treated as such. the laws affected them too, so it was only fair they had a say. men are a bit dim, but they primarily wanted to keep exploiting women.
Answer:
In closed meetings by all adult white male citizens.
Explanation:
I took the test
Answer:
The statements that agree with Mexican Politics are options B & D
B) The main party is the Institutional Reconstruction Party.
D) The Institutional Revolutionary Party was in control since the 1920s.
Explanation:
The Institutional Revolutionary party created by Plutarco Elias Calles, Mexico's Paramount leader at that time and self proclaimed supreme chief of Mexican revolution is a Mexican party founded in 1929 and held power in the country uninterruptedly for seventy one(71) years from 1929 - 2000 with it name changing accross time from National Revolutionary Party to The party of Mexican Revolution and it final last name as the Institutional Revolutionary Party in 1946.
The aim of the party when created was to provide a political space that surviving leaders, and the combatants of Mexican's Revolution would participate and resolve the political crisis the was caused with the assassination of President-elect Alvaro Obregon in 1928.
It is the main party in the Mexican politics history as it held power for most number of years and has been in control of the Mexican Politics since the year 1929 till it eventual end in year 2000.
Answer:
Compare the amendment process in West Virginia to that of the national government is described below in details.
Explanation:
West Virginia's constitution, nevertheless, did not possess a preamble till 1960. In enhancement to the system of federalism, the WV constitution is established on the democratic beliefs of freedom, restricted government, division of powers, and checks and balances.
Any improvement or amendments to this Constitution may be introduced in the Senate or House of Delegates, and if the identical shall be consented to by a majority of the segments elected to respectively of the two houses, such recommended improvement or amendments shall be registered on their records, the name of each member.
Answer:
It interpreted racial segregation as acceptable under the equal protection clause at a time when racism was still socially acceptable. ... It challenged southern ideas of white supremacy at a time when northern states were extremely supportive of equal rights for all races.
Explanation:
fund it on the internet.
hope this helps :)