Answer:
Four of them. Because the rest of them, didn’t really help their argument. Which is their prerogative and the towers, the times, and Jay’s story are not matching--
Explanation: Sort of from 12:07 until 6:07, that window of time is where Jay’s story doesn’t line up with the cell phone records. And the timeline he’s giving is not lining up with the times of the cell phone calls.
The main plot points in Jay’s story have been consistent. He tells them that consistently, Jay “has always given the same story about what the defendant did where. Consistently, he tells Jennifer a consistent story, he tells police a consistent story about the defendant, he tells consistently the defendant’s involvement, the defendant’s actions on that day. He has never wavered on that point. And they were suspecting him to not be telling the truth.
The inference is that the words reveling and rejoicing shows that the narrator showed his enjoyment and excitement for nature.
<h3>What is an inference?</h3>
It should be noted that an inference is the conclusion that can be deduced based on the information that is provided in the literary work.
It should be noted that the narrator see nature as something that brings excitement and happiness.
Therefore, the inference is that the words reveling and rejoicing shows that the narrator showed his enjoyment and excitement for nature.
Learn more about inference on:
brainly.com/question/25280941
#SPJ1
Answer: B
Explanation: because it dose not use the word I
