Even though George Wallace's argument was structured well and used some of the same sources as Dr. King, Dr. King's message about brotherhood was more convincing. George Wallace argued for freedom for the states to do as they liked, but no one should be allowed to ignore the rights of individuals and we should all be treated equally. Wallace realized this is his own life.
Read more on Brainly.com -
brainly.com/question/5773752#readmore
This is incorrect because for an argument to be valid it's premises have to be truthful. Fallacies are logical errors which make the premises untruthful and should therefore be avoided. There are various types of fallacies but most commonly they are divided into inductive and deductive fallacies.
The correct answer is option letter A (Version 1 uses chronological order, building up to the action. Version 2 starts with the conclusion to make readers curious about the beginning). There is <u>a clear contrast</u> between the narrative structures of Version 1 and Version 2, since <u>Version 1</u> narrates a series of events in a chronological order leading to a possible climax by making lots of descriptions of the place and her feelings and <u>Version 2</u> sums up the narrative stating her departure and the thoughts of retelling her past experiences during the two camping days. The rest of the options are not correct, either because they mix up the real organization of Yasmin’s narrative or because they mention details that are not present in her narrative.