Answer:
corporeal: bodily, fleshly
Inferred definition: relating to the human body
corpulent: obese, overweight
Inferred definition: fat
corps: unit, division, troop
Inferred definition: a military troop/unit
Explanation:
b because she cant get education if school is shut
Answer:
Mr Dunbar is using the tool of Association.
Explanation:
In psychology, Association simply refers to the practice of linking two or more information for ease of recall. This is the way the human brain is wired to recall.
Every information in the mind is an organisation of associated ideas, occurrences, things and so on.
So to help students learn and remember faster, good teachers use the power of association to help them recall easily.
For example, do you remember the song "Do-Re-Mi" from Sound of Music?
That song teaches one how to memorize the music sofa in a fun and easy to recall way using imagery and association.
Cheers!
Because Ophelia has referred to Hamlet's flirtations as "tenders," her father uses that meaning first. He went on to use the word "tender" as a verb, meaning to offer as payment. Finally, he uses "tender" as a synonym for "make" in the last line, meaning she'll make him look like a fool if his daughter is romantically used and dumped by the prince.
Personally, I would choose this topic:Speech related to violence: You might want to write about limitations on freedom of speech related to violence. Speech that incites violence is not covered by the First Amendment and can result in prosecution in the United States. However, speech that merely supports violence as a political option is not considered a crime.
Part A: As this topic is something that is more of a national issue than one within one single school, I would address the letter to a member of congress. Addressing it to anyone else would do little to actually address the issue.
Part B:
Stance: While freedom of speech allows one to express their opinions publicly, those who engage in speech promoting violence, or hate speech, negatively impact society as a whole as well as on an individual level. As such, speech promoting violence should not be considered under the First Amendment, and those individuals who choose to engage in it should be persecuted.
