Do you know the context?
I suppose the quotation is stressing that the writer has put a lot of effort into getting their argument/grievances heard by the parliament, and that said parliament is 'tyrannical', implying that it rules without concern for the people or accountability to them. It seems that the quote may be a way of justifying some later action, essentially saying; 'we've tried and failed to do this in the proper way, so now we must be more forceful'.
Their colonial experience led them to the point where they were sick of monarchistic European influence and wanted to create a fully democratic republic, created by the people for the people, not for the well being of a royal family.
Answer:
This would be -Make legally null and void; invalidate.
Explanation:
Answer:
The right option is D.
Explanation:
With their reporting, the newspapers of the era - there was no radio, no TV or internet - played a fundamental role in molding the mood of public opinion, thus creating pressure on the government to act; they also stirred sympathy for the Cuban rebellion, and with their coverage of the Maine warship incident, they inflamed the feelings of the public. So, the print media actively influenced policies related to the war.
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "Exclusionary rule." The e<span>xclusionary rule </span>says that evidence gained as a result of an illegal act by police cannot be used against the person from whom it was seized
