1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
OLga [1]
3 years ago
15

7(3n-1) + 7n= -38-3n

History
1 answer:
Sophie [7]3 years ago
5 0
28n-7=-38-3n

31n-7=38

31n=-31

n= -1
You might be interested in
Why did those sympathetic to slavery in Union Border States such as Kentucky and Delaware not support the Emancipation Proclamat
Reil [10]

Those sympathetic to slavery in Union border states, such as Kentucky and Delaware, did not support the Emancipation Proclamation because it granted freedom to slaves if their home southern states did not join the Union by January 1, 1863.

Missouri, Maryland, Kentucky and Delaware were slave holding border states and not in rebellion from the Union so the Proclamation did not effect their slaves. But, the area of the border states were closely linked to the South and held political, economic, geographic, and social connections to the Southern (and Northern) states. This led border states to not support the Emancipation Proclamation.

3 0
3 years ago
When Reason offers her her sober light, if they (women] be really capable of acting like rational
vova2212 [387]

Answer:

...c

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Which of these was not a reason that the Cold War was able to begin?
Gekata [30.6K]
The correct answer should be <span>A united plan for Europe by the Soviet Union and America

Germany was a key figure here because the Soviets wanted to keep it weak while Americans wanted to rebuild it as a democratic place. The Soviets also disliked the fact that there were ideological tensions between the two countries as the Americans hated the communists and the communists hated the Americans.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Which statements are true about the magna Carta
almond37 [142]

Answer:

3. The Magna Carta guaranteed that the king could not impose new taxes without permission from a council.

1. English barons and church leaders wrote the Magna Carta because they could no longer tolerate King John's abuses of their traditional rights.

Another way to rephrase the first one is;

Among the many restrictions placed upon the King by the Nobles was the idea that the king could not impose taxes without the approval of the “common counsel” of the Kingdom:

Another way to rephrase the second one is;

The committee of Twenty Five were a group of barons in the forefront of the opposition to King John who were entrusted by the terms of clause 61 of Magna Carta to ensure the king’s compliance with its terms.

The church clergy that helped were Cathedral churches in Salisbury and Lincoln.

Explanation:

Justice

King John’s father, Henry II (r. 1154–89), introduced extensive judicial reforms, established the authority of the royal courts and laid firm foundations for the future system of justice in England. In contrast, John regularly abused the justice system to suppress his opponents and to extort revenue from the barons. The justice system and feudal law were two of the main themes addressed in Magna Carta, and the most famous clause dealt with justice:

No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any other way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgement of his equals or by the law of the land.

The barons ensured that numerous other clauses in Magna Carta defined in more detail how the justice system and its officials were to operate. These clauses sought to remedy specific abuses by the king and to make the system more consistent, accessible and fair.

Magna Carta and peace

Many of the clauses towards the end of Magna Carta were practical arrangements for making peace. Rather than looking forward to how the king was to behave in the future, these clauses sought to put right the wrongs done by King John.

The king was immediately to return all hostages, to remove all foreign knights and mercenaries from England, to remit all fines exacted unjustly, and to restore lands, castles and liberties to all who had been wrongfully deprived of them. These clauses were not statements of legal principle, but they were a part of the peace-making process.

All the others are not true as King John had no choice at all.

Perhaps the most radical clause in Magna Carta was the 61st, which set up an elected commission of 25 barons to monitor the king’s compliance with the settlement and to enforce its terms. The 25 barons had the power to seize the king’s property in order to seek redress if he failed to keep the terms imposed on him. This innovative clause demonstrated the power invested in Magna Carta to limit royal authority

6 0
2 years ago
What were the main tenets of lutheranism, calvinism, and anabaptism, and how did theu differ from each other and from catholicis
irina [24]

theres your anwser please please mark as brainlest

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was a direct result of the desison in brown v brown v board of education
    15·1 answer
  • How might modern<br> developments have changed trade routes through Arabia since the 500's
    15·1 answer
  • 22
    12·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME... I am taking the pretest in World History.
    14·2 answers
  • Two-thirds of all illiterate adults worldwide are men
    13·1 answer
  • How did World War I affect support for the women’s voting movement?
    7·2 answers
  • Who bought manhatten island
    13·1 answer
  • Need this asap
    14·1 answer
  • Why didn’t some colonists want to break away from Britain​
    13·1 answer
  • The 15th amendment initially, granted African American men the right to vote.
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!