1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MA_775_DIABLO [31]
3 years ago
5

What is the main difference between the Justinian code and the natural rights of Thomas Jefferson ?

History
1 answer:
Helga [31]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

According to the Justinian Digest, natural law is that which nature has taught all living things: for this right is inherent not only to the human race, but to all animals that are born on land and in the sea, and birds; this includes a union of a man and a woman, which we call marriage; here also the offspring of children, here the upbringing. We see that animals, even wild ones, have knowledge of this right – Justinian stated.

At the same time, according to him, the right of peoples is that which is enjoyed by the peoples of mankind; one can easily understand its difference from natural law: the latter is common for all animals, and the former is only for humans (in their relations) among themselves.

The concept of natural law became common in the 17th century, during the formation of industrial civilization. The major thinkers of this time, and, after them, the enlighteners of the 17th century, called as natural the right to satisfy the basic needs of human, given to every person by nature itself. These natural rights primarily included the right to life and its preservation, to basic necessities of life, to protection from hostile encroachment.

Jefferson lists life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as a natural right. He claimed that all people are created equal.

In Digest, along with the concept of law (jus), the traditional concept of "justice" (justitia) is used, but it is interpreted as "justice" in the spirit of Christian morality. In Jefferson's interpretation of the problems of social equality of people, their inalienable rights to life and freedom, one can see the influence of Locke's ideas of bourgeois liberalism.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
____ from the north plundered and burned Rome in 386 B.C.E.
Crazy boy [7]
Hello there.

<span>from the north plundered and burned Rome in 386 B.C.E.

Answer: </span><span>C Gauls

</span><span>is the traditional founder of the Roman Republic, who overthrew the Etruscan kings in 509 B.C.E
</span>
Answer: <span>B Lucius Junius Brutus

</span><span>The __ Sea runs along the western coast of Italy.

Answer: </span>D Tyrrhenian
8 0
4 years ago
Why did the British fire on the colonists, what were they afraid of?
stiks02 [169]

They heard a shot come from an unknown area, and were afraid it was coming towards them.

4 0
3 years ago
How did Palestinian Arabs react to the plan proposed by the United Nations to divide Palestine into two separate states?
mario62 [17]
The "Palestinians" of the time were everybody who lived in the British mandate ... Jews, Arabs, Christians, and others, all of them 'Palestinians'. The surrounding Arab nations opposed the UN resolution to divide the mandate and I give the Jews administrative control over any of it. The Jews declared their piece to be a state. The Arabs didn't. And five Arab nations massed their military forces, and attacked Israel. Even though Israel was only days old, and had no army or air Force, the attackers failed to conquer Israel. That was almost 70 years ago. In that time, they have never absorbed the Arabs who left Israel, they have not built their own state, they still don't want Israel to exist, they have attacked it two more times, and now they teach their children to hate all Jews.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
One Party Governments<br> What are 2 advantages of a 2-party systems?
bogdanovich [222]

Answer:

2 parties makes it easier to vote. balance is achieved multi. interests and opinions are achieved

5 0
4 years ago
Why do you think the California gold rush increased demand for a transcontinental railroad?
olasank [31]

Answer:

With no gold rush, there is no gigantic rush to populate that region. If there aren't enough people then there aren't enough businesses and the economic network is tiny.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The fact that the constitution is the "supreme law of the land" illustrates which aspect of our government?
    12·2 answers
  • In addition to his Farewell Address, part of George Washington's legacy was that he:
    11·1 answer
  • Which parts of the economy grew during the 1990s and which declined?
    13·1 answer
  • The rule of law applies equally to people in government and citizens alike true or false
    14·1 answer
  • How did colonial divisions in Africa lead to conflict between native African tribes
    14·2 answers
  • How should the US address controversial icons from the Confederacy? ​
    15·1 answer
  • Why did president Eisenhower send federal troops to Little Rock Arkansas in 1957
    14·2 answers
  • All of the following contributed to colonists' call for independence from Britain EXCEPT: a The Boston Massacre b lack of repres
    6·1 answer
  • Why did American businesses need to expand overseas?
    5·1 answer
  • What is William Lloyd Garrison's view of the U.S. Constitution?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!