1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Triss [41]
3 years ago
14

What were the new laws called in the Industrial Revolution

History
1 answer:
HACTEHA [7]3 years ago
8 0
During the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries Great Britain became the first country to industrialize. Because of this, it was also the first country where the nature of children’s work changed so dramatically that child labor became seen as a social problem and a political issue.<span>Children of poor and working-class families had worked for centuries before industrialization – helping around the house or assisting in the family’s enterprise when they were able. The practice of putting children to work was first documented in the Medieval era when fathers had their children spin thread for them to weave on the loom. Children performed a variety of tasks that were auxiliary to their parents but critical to the family economy. The family’s household needs determined the family’s supply of labor and “the interdependence of work and residence, of household labor needs, subsidence requirements, and family relationships constituted the ‘family economy</span>
You might be interested in
National Govt.
alexandr1967 [171]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

In my opinion, I would choose A because the others seem wrong. Only the president can get that power.

3 0
3 years ago
Great Britain and France avoided a take over by fascist by
maks197457 [2]

Answer:

Great Britain and France avoid a take over by fascists' by restricting freedom of speech.

Explanation:

Fascism is a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc. , and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.  

How Britain and France avoided fascist revolution inside their own country during rise of fascism in Italy and Germany?

What made Mussolini’s Fascism, and Lenin’s Communism too, was a specific and unique situation, never to be repeated in later history: namely, the presence of enormous masses of disaffected veterans, with recent experience of war at a very high technical level of skill, and angry about the condition of their country. (And of enormous amounts of weapons.) Fascism was not made by speeches or by money, but by tens of thousands of men gathering in armed bands to beat up enemies. And that being the case, what happened to the similar masses of veterans who came home to France, Britain, and America too, after 1918?

Well, France was exhausted. She had fought with her full strength from day one, whereas Britain had taken time to deploy its whole strength, and America and Italy had only entered the war much later. For five years, every man who could be spared had been at the Front. Her losses were larger in proportion than those of any other great power. And on the positive side, France, like Britain and America, was prosperous. The veterans went home to a country that was comparatively able to receive them, give them a place to be, and not foster any dangerous mass disaffection. This is of course relatively speaking. There will have been anger enough, irritation enough, even some disaffection. But the only real case of violence from below due to disaffection was the riot in Paris that followed the Stavisky affair in early 1934, and that, compared to what took place daily in other countries, was a very bad play of a riot.

ON the other hand, both America and Britain experienced situations that had more than a taste of Fascism, but that failed to develop into freedom-destroying movements. In America, Fascism could have come from above. The last few years of the Wilson administration were horrendous: the Red Scare fanaticized large strata of the population, and the hatred came from the top, from Wilson and his terrible AG Palmer. (Palmer was a Quaker. So was Richard Nixon. Is there a reason why Quakers in politics should prove particularly dangerous?) Hate and fear of “reds” was also the driving force of Italian Fascism; and Wilson and Palmer mobilized it in ways and with goals that Mussolini would have understood. Had Wilson not suffered his famous collapse, he might have been a real danger: he intended to run for a third term in office. And the nationwide spread of the new KKK, well beyond the bounds of the old South, shows that he might have found a pool of willing stormtroopers. Altogether, I think America dodged a bullet the size of a Gatling shot when Wilson collapsed in office.

Britain’s own Blackshirt moment took place in Ireland. Sociologically, culturally, psychologically, the Blacks and Tans were the Blackshirts of Britain - masses of disaffected veterans sent into the streets to harass and terrify political enemies, bullies in non-standard uniforms with a loose relationship with the authorities. Only, their relationship with public opinion developed in an exactly opposite direction. Whereas Italy’s majority, horrified by Socialist violence at home and by Communist brutality abroad, tended increasingly to excuse the Blackshirts and wink at their violence, in Britain - possibly because of the influence of the American media, which were largely against British rule in Ireland - the paramilitary force found itself increasingly isolated from the country’s mainstream, and eventually their evil reputation became an asset to their own enemies and contributed to British acceptance of Irish independence.

Thanks,
Eddie

5 0
1 year ago
Which idea guided the development of the articles of confederation? a a strong central government would threaten the rights of t
attashe74 [19]
It was<span> 240 years ago today that the </span>Articles<span> of </span>Confederation<span>, the first American constitution, </span>was<span> sent to the 13 states for consideration.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following best explains the changes in higher education in Oklahoma in the 60s and 70s? A. Oklahomans ignored highe
raketka [301]

Answer:it’s C

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Andrew Jackson's plan to weaken the National Bank led to:
Ymorist [56]

Answer:

d

Explanation:

bro people get scared bevause of that obvsiouly. idk i honestly guesed i hope its right bro im sorry

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • ___ believed that if a person found and achieved his functions in life he would be truly.
    13·2 answers
  • What role did Russia play during world war 1?
    15·1 answer
  • What was promised to slaves that encouraged them to fight for the British? education money freedom land
    6·2 answers
  • A sword that was made in 1317. Is it a primary or secondary sourc?
    12·1 answer
  • What did a Jacob’s Staff do for the 16th century navigation
    13·1 answer
  • In Athens, what involvement could citizens have in the passage of laws?
    11·1 answer
  • What was one important effect of the supreme court ruling in gibbons v ogden?
    7·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!!! WILL CHOOSE BRAINLIEST!
    14·1 answer
  • Explain the beginning of the Cold War
    8·2 answers
  • Tdh-hqep-bjx join join​
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!