<span>The correct answer here is that in the extract included above, Bharat is characterised as a reluctant King. We can observe this based upon the interactions between he and other characters, and the level of persuasion needed in order for him to take actions that show the amount of power he has.</span>
Answer:
get out of the ticket
Explanation:
In chapter 4 of the novel "The Great Gatsby" when Gatsby was being pulled over by a policeman for speeding, he shows him a white card.
This white card, in the novel, symbolises injustice and corruption that prevailed in the society. Gatsby was able to get that white card because once he favoured the commissioner. Gatsby used to get these white card every year from the commissioner. So, whenever Gatsby would break any rule he was able to get off easily by just waving off this white or Christmas card from the commissioner.
So, the complete the sentence above the correct phrase is 'get out of the ticket.' Gatsby waved the white card to get off from getting a ticket.
:Mrs. Hale is the most sympathetic to Minnie Wright because she knows about Minnie's unhappy marriage to Mr. Wright. Her sympathy is also driven by her own guilt over not visiting Minnie, despite being her neighbor. Her sympathy is also evident when Mrs. Hale asks Mrs. Peters to lie to Minnie about her preserves:
MRS HALE: I might have known she needed help! I know how things can be—for women. I tell you, it's queer, Mrs Peters. We live close together and we live far apart. We all go through the same things—it's all just a different kind of the same thing, (brushes her eyes, noticing the bottle of fruit, reaches out for it) If I was you, I wouldn't tell her her fruit was gone. Tell her it ain't. Tell her it's all right. Take this in to prove it to her. She—she may never know whether it was broke or not.Explanation:
A person can think however they want. Actions, like many have said, define a person in the end. Someone can advocate for peace with malicious intent, but they will still likely be remembered for advocating peace and not for their impure motivations. If these contradicting images are revealed to the public, that is still an act against that person, and is no longer a thought.
However, this is only from the public's view. When it comes to people, they may as well be the embodiment of their thoughts. Everything is fueled by something. The same person who seeds their own goals under the guise of peace will not think of themselves as one who acts with the intentions of bringing peace. They will be looking to call forth whatever it is that they want, and be aware that what they present to the public is not the truth.
So, both points are arguable. It depends on whether you value the individual or the community. Actions are what are remembered, and thoughts are a person's reason. Even today, this comes into relevancy because people want to know why certain figures in history did what they did. Thoughts make a person human, after all. Without thought, seperation of man and beast would be nigh impossible. Without action, man would have been left behind long ago. Both thought and action are important indeed.
