Answer:
Ok so i am against telling the truth and telling the truth i am for both this is because in a life or death situation sometimes you have to lie. But when your telling the truth less punishments come your way The truth is essential to all of humanity. Without it, society would be in a world full of chaos. Not only would trust fall apart, but exaggerated denial, deception, and the fear of love would come into play. Lying will always come with an expense.
Without truth, there is no trust. People will lose faith and know to never trust you again, which down the road can lead to trust issues in people close to them such as family members, friends, or lovers.
Even if a situation that may be harmful to someone else, consider it in a way that if they were to be lied to it'd make it even worse. Self-confidence would diminish and they could find themselves in a state of loneliness and misunderstanding.
Lying leads to worse cases than negative truths. Take for example, a boy wants to be become a musician. He always hits the wrong note when trying to play a g-chord, and so he becomes upset and asks if he's bad. A girl replies, "No, you're amazing!" and he continues pursuing a career choice without fixing his mistakes, ending up costing him the career.
The truth may hurt, but it is nothing compared to deception. No matter the case, cause, or correlation, honesty should always come first regardless of the situation.
Explanation:
Answer:
1. You become distant from your family
2. Becuase of addiction you might suffer from physical illnesses, such as lung disease
3. Serious damage to your brain, damage that could be irriversable.
Explanation: hope this helps
Since the <em>Romantic </em>literature had set as its goal the "victory" or predominance of Man over Nature, its language tended to be somewhat triumphalistic (some would say hyperbolic) when it was about how human beings were deployed. Romanticism introduced an long-term project at a time when important scientific milestones were achieved, and also when most of modern nations and States were being founded, thus taking a voice which was very proud of national virtues, some of them legendary, part of folklore or popular culture (but belonging to a national heritage rather than coming from a more traditional stem). Neoclassicist literature was a new take on the Greek-Roman Classics, intending to bring them back into the mainstream and most of the times not fulfilling the feat. Based on this, Neoclassicist language could be felt as overblown. In a way, Romanticism was a look into the future (let us think of <em>Frankenstein </em>a very experimental novel for its time) whereas Neoclasicism very much represented a reaction to such future.
