All of these are defensible. Of course debt rises in war, and decreasing taxes will benefit an economy where taxes are no longer needed (post-scarcity.) Political and geographical boundaries are outmoded and a world without them is not only possible but existed for much of early human civilization. As for the government, a government would run more efficiently when everyone is in basic agreement with what to do and how.
I would question your teacher on this. Anyone can defend these perspectives...
Answer:The Fear of Communism and the fact that Vietnam was being a puppet like state for the soviets in which America did not want Soviets idea spreading and overcoming democracy.
Explanation:During this time Vietnam was spread apart the north Communism and south was American in which they both fought neither winning or losing important positions or landmarks and eventually we called our troops back realizing the waste of supply’s for the inevitable truth that most of the Vietnamese people accepted communism.
Answer:
British desire to take back territory.
Explanation:
Answer:
1620
Explanation:
The first English settlers in Massachusetts, the Pilgrims, established their settlement at Plymouth in 1620, and developed friendly relations with the native Wampanoag. This was the second successful permanent English colony in North America, after the Jamestown Colony.
Hope this helps:)
Answer:he is the liberator of the Jews who were captive in Babylonia.
Explanation:
