Answer:
sea travel was difficult, so trade was limited to local and regional markets.
Explanation:
/~\ The correct answer is:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<em><u>Henry Ford.</u></em>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I hope this helps! /~\
Answer:
Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966) is a historical case examined by the Supreme Court. By a decision in this case, the court established that any evidence, whether confessing or exculpatory, can be used in court only if the prosecution can prove that the suspect was informed before the interrogation about the right to a lawyer and about the right not to testify against himself. At the same time, in case of refusal of the suspect from his rights, it is necessary to prove its voluntariness. The Miranda case set a precedent requiring all police departments to inform detainees of their rights to a lawyer and silence. These warnings are called the Miranda rule. The Supreme Court equated the Miranda Rule with constitutional acts.
Explanation:
The development of irrigation systems made farming easier, as water was more easily accessible to crops. This meant that food could be produced more efficiently. More efficient farming techniques meant that food was more plentiful, where people weren't constantly scrambling for their next meal or going days without eating. It also gave people the ability to specialize in certain trades, creating better quality of goods and advancing technology in civilizations.
