<em>Answer:</em>
<em>The answer to your question is</em> <em>A. He doesnt want to insult all British people, since he found some of them to be accepting</em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>The reason Mukherji most likely use sarcasm to describe his experiences in London is that he wants to make his opinions known without being obviously insulting.</em>
<u><em>I hope this helps and have a good day!</em></u>
Objective: Us
hope this helps! (:
Answer:
B). "He found that children and adults who have read stories their whole lives were more likely to correctly identify the feelings and thoughts of others than those who do not read regularly."
C). "Trying to understand these characters exercises the same mental muscle that helps us understand people in the real world."
Explanation:
The above two evidence factually support and substantiate the claim that 'people who read stories are better at communicating and understanding the feelings of others.'
The first evidence i.e. option B states that <u>the research revealed 'the children or adults who have been reading stories constantly their whole lives are able to recognize the thoughts or feelings of others more accurately' while the second evidence i.e. option C asserts logically that 'in attempt to understand the characters of stories, the same mental muscle is required for understanding people in real life.'</u>
Thus, these two pieces of evidence not only support but substantiates how reading comprehends our understanding of thoughts, opinions, or feelings of others. Hence, <u>options B and C</u> are the correct answers.
