in the 1900s The U. S. Wanted to maintain the created expansion and not 'push its luck' with other nations.
<h3>How was United States in 1900s?</h3>
In 1900s, United States gained a lot of space and territory which was a result of some events such as as world war and others.
However, imperialistic actions on the part of the united states was made because those territory gained by United States were been secured.
Learn more about United States in 1900s at;
brainly.com/question/27451108
#SPJ1
Answer:
Option D
Explanation:
All of the following options are in effect to ensure the government does not have too much power.
<u>Option I:</u>
Government officials are indeed subject to the law, they're not above it nor are they allowed to break the law without facing repercussions.
<u>Option II:</u>
Government officials are held accountable for their actions which is true. Government officials are at risk to be impeached, which is to be removed from their position if they break any laws.
<u>Option III:</u>
Limitations are placed on how long government officials can serve, which is indeed true. Government officials aren't allowed to serve for long periods of time, they're usually allowed to serve for a few years then a new government official is voted into office.
<u>Option IV:</u>
The government is divided into branches which is again true. This is called separations of powers which was put into place to ensure the government doesn't have all the power. So, the government was spilt into three different branches and checks and balances ensures that each branch doesn't gain more power than the other.
Which means your answer is option D "i., il., iii., and iv" or all of the above.
Hope this helps.
Uhhh need more info for an answer
Answer:
I am Adam Smith
Explanation:
Dear Karl Marx
I write to you to explain, respectfully, why your economic theories are wrong.
First of all, capitalism is not doomed to fail as you say. Capitalism is the best economic system we have developed so far. Capitalism allows the free movement of goods and services, and the accumulation of capital, which leads to economic growth, and the subsequent rise in the standards of living. You yourself recognize this fact.
Secondly, capitalism is not fundamentally unfair. It is true that entrepreneurs tend to earn more than workers, but this is because they risk more than them: they risk their capital and savings, and if the business fails, they could find themselves ruined and in debt.
Finally, I do understand that there are flaws with the system, and I support intelligent intervention to solve these flaws. But it is not socialism nor communism what will solve those flaws.
Sincelery, Adam Smith.
