1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Shtirlitz [24]
3 years ago
13

What did Germany do that started World War II? A.Attacked neighboring countries without provocation B.Hosted the Munich Conferen

ce and promised peace C.Signed a nonaggression treaty with the Soviet Union D.Signed the Treaty of Versailles with France and Britain
History
2 answers:
drek231 [11]3 years ago
8 0
<span>What did Germany do that started World War II? A.Attacked neighboring countries without provocation

As we know:
German started WWII
Attacked Poland on Sept 1,1939
Britain and France declared war On Sept 3 (I forgot the year)
</span>
maw [93]3 years ago
4 0
I'm not 100% sure but i do believe germany helped start the war by there political takeover done by hitler and the nazi's, so i would say A would be the best answer seeing as it would be the only type of take over suggested here. Hope this helps!
You might be interested in
What is the core of Traditional Chinese culture?
olya-2409 [2.1K]

Answer:

The Chinese traditional cultural values of harmony, benevolence, righteousness, courtesy, wisdom, honesty, loyalty, and filial piety are embodied in China's diplomacy through the concept of harmony, the most important Chinese traditional value.

Explanation:

THANK YOU

6 0
1 year ago
Now use the chart to compare and contrast the perspectives on immigration from all three primary sources.
alukav5142 [94]

The immigrants are viewed as people who should be pitied and allowed in as they are mostly Jewish refugees, fleeing persecution, according to <em>Emma Lazarus' </em><em>The Colossus.</em>

<h3>What is a Primary Source?</h3>

This refers to the first-hand account of a topic or a narration that is usually reliable.

Emma Lazarus was of the opinion that immigrants can be Americans as she used the Statue of Liberty as a symbol of a welcoming mother to all immigrants. She also felt that all immigrants were equal and one was not superior to the other.

Thomas Bailey in his poem, <em>The Unguarded Gates</em>, is critical of immigrants coming to America. From the tone of the poem, he is a white supremacist and also an advocate of nationalism which also shows that he thought some immigrants were less equal than others.

<em>The Babel Proclamation </em>by the Iowa Governor William Harding showed the controversial declaration that only English should be spoken in public places and also he had strong anti-German sentiments in the wake of World War I and he was anti-immigration and thought some immigrants were less equal than others.

Read more about primary sources here:

brainly.com/question/896456

#SPJ1

8 0
2 years ago
In what ways were the actions of the federal government responsible for increasing social and political tensions between the Nor
barxatty [35]

Answer:

The answer is:

There are four categories they can  be classified under: Slavery, Cultural (Social), Economic, and Constitutional (Political).

Explanation:

The south was an agricultural based economy and the north was industrial based. the south had cotton that was needed to make clothing and the north had textile factories to make them. this led to conflict between the two regions

The southern states were pro slavery bc they owned a large portion of land, the the northerners were anti slavery. this caused conflict between the regions .

7 0
3 years ago
Pls Pls Pls Pls answer dis ASAP I WLL GIVE YOU 25 POINTS BUT IT HAS TO BE RIGHT
soldier1979 [14.2K]

Answer: Drafting

The delegates ultimately combined elements of both plans in what became known as the Connecticut Compromise. The legislative branch would be bicameral, consisting of an upper house—the Senate—and a lower house—the House of Representatives. Representation in the House would be based on population, and each state was allotted two seats in the Senate. The office of the president would constitute the executive authority and was to be chosen by the electoral college.

The structure of government would be federalist in nature, consisting of three independent branches: the legislature, Congress; the executive, the president: and the judicial, the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court would adjudicate disputes between states, and Congress was authorized to levy taxes, declare war, raise an army, regulate interstate commerce, and draft laws consistent with the purpose of exercising these powers.

The compromise also addressed another major point of contention between northern and southern states over the issue of slavery. Should enslaved people be counted for the purpose of a state’s representation in Congress? And if so, how? The northern states did not think enslaved people should be counted at all, while the southern slaveholding states thought they should. The Three-Fifths Compromise established that enslaved men and women would be represented in the House at a ratio of 3 to 5 of their actual numbers. Thus, every five individuals would count as three for the purposes of both legislative representation and taxation.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was one of the most notorious provisions of the Constitution. For delegates from the northern states, many of whom were morally opposed to the institution of slavery, the compromise was viewed as a necessary evil in order to secure the ratification of the Constitution since the southern states had threatened to refuse to ratify the document if the interests of southern slaveholders were not protected therein.

- RATIFYING the Constitution

Before the Constitution could take effect, it had to be ratified—formally approved by the assemblies of at least nine of the 12 states that had sent delegates to the convention.Ironically enough, after the acrimonious debates over legislative representation, the small states were the first to ratify the Constitution. The most serious opposition to ratifying the document came from the larger states of Massachusetts, New York, and Virginia. These states were home to large rural populations that sympathized with the plight of farmers like Daniel Shays, who had spearheaded a rebellion against what he perceived as the unjust economic policies and political corruption of the Massachusetts state legislature.

According to many of the Constitution’s opponents, it would create a large, intrusive, and much too powerful federal government that would inevitably recreate the tyranny that the Patriots had fought against in the American Revolution. In order to combat this opposition and get the Constitution ratified, a series of amendments, known as the Bill of Rights, was appended to the document to ensure that the federal government would respect the natural rights of citizens.

4 0
3 years ago
Which wars did John Steinbeck's "Symptoms" and Tim O'Brien's "Ambush" discuss?
disa [49]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • American Attitudes toward Jewish immigration in the 1930s.
    13·2 answers
  • List of incorporated cities in cameron county
    6·1 answer
  • I GIVE BRAINLIEST PLZ HELP!!!
    13·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP I WILL MARK THE BRAINLYNEST IF CORRECT THANK YOU, Under what circumstances did Calvin Coolidge come to the presidenc
    14·2 answers
  • 8. What was a major goal of the Soviets after the war?
    13·2 answers
  • 5. Why did Muslims not want to be part of an independent India?
    14·2 answers
  • How to simplify an improper and proper fraction​
    14·1 answer
  • List the following events in the correct chronological order.
    6·1 answer
  • Which scientist developed the Scientific method?
    7·1 answer
  • How did the declaration of independence affect Native Americans?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!