Explain the negative impact of government subsidies for railroads (AP U.S. History)

1 answer:

5 0

The government gave subsidies for railroads companies with money from the people, these companies had land grants and received millions of acres of public land meanwhile some people did not have a place to live. The companies sold the land, made money from it and built their railroads. This also increased corruption in the government - historians say that members of the state legislature would deliberately introduce legislation threatening the interests of railroads in his state if the railroad's companies would not pay some sort of blackmail -.

Railroad companies would also use the power to destroy existing competitors in the field and prevented this way the emergence of new ones, for this they used the political connection.

Railroad companies would also create railroad projects with the only means to obtain government cash without any true commercial evaluations. They would pocket money and vanish without building anything.

You might be interested in

What were Rockefeller’s motivation for philanthropy

love history [14]

Answer: According to its definition, philanthropy is the desire to promote the welfare of others, expressed especially by the generous donation of money to good causes. Many of the world's wealthiest individuals and companies are involved in all kinds of philanthropic activities and endeavors.

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

What is the name of the narrow artificial waterway in Egypt that joins the Mediterranean and Red Seas?

vazorg [7]

It is named the Suez Canal

3 0

3 years ago

What is the most likely reason mexican citizens had conflicting views of porfirio diaz’s rule? he had a popular agenda of libera

In-s [12.5K]

The most likely reason mexican citizens had conflicting views of porfirio Diaz’s rule is because He limited citizens' freedoms but he increased foreign investments and improved infrastructure. This is further explained below.

Generally, During the president of Porfirio Daz (1876–80; 1884–1911), Mexico witnessed considerable development but political rights were constrained and the free press was muzzled. This era is known as the Porfiriato.

In conclusion, The fact that Porfirio Diaz restricted citizens' freedoms while boosting foreign investment and improving infrastructure is the most likely source of the mixed opinions that Mexicans held of his leadership.