<span>By building more weapons than the Soviet Union, the United States would be more powerful.</span>
Explanation:
Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the use of eminent domain to transfer land from one private owner to another private owner to further economic development. In a 5–4 decision, the Court held that the general benefits a community enjoyed from economic growth qualified private redevelopment plans as a permissible "public use" under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.[1]
The case arose in the context of condemnation by the city of New London, Connecticut, of privately owned real property, so that it could be used as part of a "comprehensive redevelopment plan." After the Court's decision, the city allowed a private developer to proceed with its plans; however, the developer was unable to obtain financing and abandoned the project, and the contested land remained an undeveloped empty lot in 2019.
Does this help?
Answer:
cause and effects
Explanation:
cause- economics, aggressive tax, political corruption
effects- the situation made the government replace articles of confederation
The senate power of advice and consent does not apply to "executive orders," since although the Senate can approve Presidential appointments in many cases, executive orders are not prone to such approval.
Answer:
The first 10 amendments to the constitution
Explanation:
It is what it is
