1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
amm1812
3 years ago
8

Which government document served as the colonies' central legal document until it was replaced by the U.S. Constitution in 1787?

History
1 answer:
Nesterboy [21]3 years ago
8 0
The answer you are looking for is fundamental order
You might be interested in
Which of the following is a true statement
a_sh-v [17]
The Malcontents' major complaints were that the Trustees had placed too many limitations on the ownership of land, the right to make and to buy alcohol, and the right to own slaves. B
4 0
3 years ago
In your own words, describe what the Homestead Act of 1862 does.
Annette [7]

Answer:

the homestead act of 1862 provides U.S. citizens a chance to buy public domain/ government land to help settle and migrate people to the american west.

3 0
4 years ago
Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti had many things in common, including that both men
Varvara68 [4.7K]
The answer is A because they were Italian and didn't have a fair trial because they were strictly tried on the fact that they were immigrants
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the united states entered world war 1?
Kitty [74]
The United States entered the war because of the Germans' decision to resume the policy of unrestricted submarine warfare, and the so-called 'Zimmerman telegram,' intercepted by the British, in which Germany floated the idea of an alliance with Mexico.
8 0
3 years ago
Compare the social climate of the United States at the beginning of the Great War to the social climate at the end of the war. H
Rina8888 [55]

USA enters the Great War

Wilson’s most passionate desire, aside from avoiding belligerency, was to bring an end to the war through his personal mediation. He sent Colonel House to Europe in early 1915 to explore the possibilities of peace and again early in 1916 to press for a plan of Anglo-American cooperation for peace. The British refused to cooperate, and the president, more than ever eager to avoid a final confrontation with Germany on the submarine issue, decided to press forward with independent mediation. He was by this time also angered by the intensification of British blockade practices and convinced that both sides were fighting for world domination and spoils. On December 18, 1916, Wilson asked the belligerents to state the terms upon which they would be willing to make peace. Soon afterward, in secret, high-level negotiations, he appealed to Britain and Germany to hold an early peace conference under his leadership.

Break with Germany

Chances for peace were blasted by a decision of the German leaders, made at an imperial conference on January 9, 1917, to inaugurate an all-out submarine war against all commerce, neutral as well as belligerent. The Germans knew that such a campaign would bring the United States into the war, but they were confident that their augmented submarine fleet could starve Britain into submission before the United States could mobilize and participate effectively.

The announcement of the new submarine blockade in January left the president no alternative but to break diplomatic relations with Germany, which he did on February 3. At the same time, and in subsequent addresses, the president made it clear that he would accept unrestricted submarine warfare against belligerent merchantmen and would act only if American ships were sunk. In early March he put arms on American ships in the hope that this would deter submarine attacks. The Germans began to sink American ships indiscriminately in mid-March, and on April 2 Wilson asked Congress to recognize that a state of war existed between the United States and the German Empire. Congress approved the war resolution quickly, and Wilson signed it on April 6. (For U.S. military involvement in World War I, see the article World War I.)

“Big Four”

“Big Four”

The “Big Four” (left to right): David Lloyd George of Britain, Vittorio Orlando of Italy, Georges Clemenceau of France, and Woodrow Wilson of the United States, the principal architects of the Treaty of Versailles.

National Archives, Washington, D.C.

The fight over the treaty and the election of 1920

Public opinion in the United States seemed strongly in favour of quick ratification of the Versailles Treaty when the president presented that document to the Senate in July 1919. Traditional isolationist sentiment was beginning to revive, however, and a small minority of 16 senators, irreconcilably opposed to U.S. membership in the League, vowed to oppose the treaty to the bitter end. In addition, a crucial controversy developed between the president and a majority of the Republican senators, led by Henry Cabot Lodge of Massachusetts. Lodge insisted upon adding 14 reservations to the treaty. The second reservation declared that the United States assumed no obligations under Article X of the Covenant, which guaranteed the integrity and independence of members of the League; moreover it said that the president could not use the armed forces to support the Covenant without the explicit consent of Congress.

Henry Cabot Lodge

Henry Cabot Lodge

Henry Cabot Lodge, c. 1898.

Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. (Digital File Number: cph.3b25369)

Calling this reservation a nullification of the treaty, Wilson in September made a long speaking tour of the West to build up public support for unconditional ratification. He suffered a breakdown at the end of his tour and a serious stroke on October 2. The president’s illness, which incapacitated him for several months, increased his intransigence against the Lodge reservations; with equal stubbornness, the Massachusetts senator refused to consent to any compromise. The result was failure to obtain the necessary two-thirds majority for ratification, with or without reservations, when the Senate voted on November 19, 1919, and again on March 19, 1920.

Wilson had suggested that the ensuing presidential campaign and election should be a “great and solemn referendum” on the League. The Democratic candidate, James M. Cox of Ohio, fought hard to make it the leading issue, but the Republican candidate, Warren G. Harding of Ohio, was evasive on the subject, and a group of 31 leading Republican internationalists assured the country that Harding’s election would be the best guarantee of U.S. membership in the League of Nations. Harding swamped Cox (see U.S. presidential election of 1920),

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What agreement was reached at the Potsdam Conference?
    5·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME U GUYYS
    12·2 answers
  • Was jackson more of a hamiltonian or jeffersonian?
    9·1 answer
  • What was the Anaconda Plan? Why was it important and what did it do?
    14·1 answer
  • 3. Recognize Effects How did the beliefs and practices
    7·1 answer
  • Who believed additional protections in the constitution would further secure the rights and liberties of citizens?
    7·1 answer
  • The first human to orbit the Earth was a Russian aboard the Vostok 1? true or false?
    15·1 answer
  • What is an example of a benefit of government involvement in the economy
    10·2 answers
  • Who invented the alphabet? (BRAINLIST) Also is can't in the dictionary? .3.
    10·2 answers
  • Which philosopher of the Enlightenment most influenced Thomas Jefferson
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!