Answer:
Ethos-
the characteristic spirit of a culture, era, or community as manifested in its beliefs and aspirations:
Pathos- an element in experience or in artistic representation evoking pity or compassion
Explanation:
Hope this helps
Answer:
ok
Explanation:
dad have been working so hard in school so i can make you proud of me .so dad i hope u doing fine
Answer:
OA. Deaf View/Image Art, a type of Deaf art that covers all of the visual arts and is by Deaf artists and about Deaf life.
Explanation:
Deaf View/ Image Art or De'VIA is an art form that is made by deaf people and made with the objective of expressing the arts for deaf people. This art form covers the cultural, or linguistic platform allowing deaf artists to express their experience.
What Malcolm saw in the advertisement is this type of event that will showcase art by and for the deaf. And in that process, he will be able to experience the same feeling and understand people like him, through the artworks that will be at the show.
Thus, the correct answer is option A.
Hey there!
<span>
How does Socrates characterize the difference between his accusers’ rhetoric and his own in this excerpt from The Apology?
Answer: D) </span>
<span>His rhetoric is more deliberate and well thought out.
Hope this helps
Have a great day (:
</span>
Read the excerpt from the US Supreme court case Plessy v. Ferguson (1896).
The statute of Louisiana, acts of 1890, c. 111, requiring railway companies carrying passengers in their coaches in that State, to provide equal, but separate, accommodations for the white and colored races, by providing two or more passenger coaches for each passenger train, or by dividing the passenger coaches by a partition so as to secure separate accommodations; and providing that no person shall be permitted to occupy seats in coaches other than the ones assigned to them, on account of the race they belong to; and requiring the officer of the passenger train to assign each passenger to the coach or compartment assigned for the race to which he or she belong; and imposing fines or imprisonment upon passengers insisting on going into a coach or compartment other than the one set aide for the race to which he or she belongs; and conferring upon officers of the train power to refuse to carry on the train passengers refusing to occupy the coach or compartment assigned to them, and exempting the railway company from liability for such refusal, are not in conflict with the provisions either of the Thirteenth Amendment or of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
Which best explains why the Supreme Court’s decision in Plessy v. Ferguson was unconstitutional?
