1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yan [13]
3 years ago
12

What do the cases marbury v madison, mcculloch v maryland, gibbons v ogden and dartmouth v woodward have in common?

History
1 answer:
Alexxx [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

What they have in common was the following:

Explanation:

Both of these cases involved imposing restrictions on the state government and both ruled in favor of the federal government, demonstrating that, if ever there was a dispute between the federal government and a state government, the federal government would automatically win. McCulloch vs. Maryland ruled that the federal government could not tax the state governments, and Gibbons vs. Ogden ruled that the federal government alone had the power to regulate interstate trade. The Supreme Court has said the federal government is winning in both cases.

You might be interested in
Facts about crusades holy wars
maxonik [38]
The crusades were created by western European Christians after centuries of Muslim wars of expansion. To stop the expansion of Muslim states they had to reclaim christianity and the holy land in the middle east.
3 0
3 years ago
William paterson presented what became known as the virginia plan. <br> a. True <br> b. False
maw [93]
False, On May 29, 1787, Virginia delegate Edmund Randolph proposed what became known as "The Virginia Plan."
8 0
4 years ago
Which is an example of a voting requirement that was used to prevent African Americans from voting during the Jim Crow era?
RUDIKE [14]
Taxing African Americans when they voted. (Poll Taxes)
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do you think every area under US control should have representation in Congress? Why or why not?
ser-zykov [4K]

Yes, as this would ensure more equal representation for the US's states and all territories which is occupied without much care. These territories would be able to become involved, allowing the people more freedom and more power, creating a better living situation for themselves and therefore bettering the US as a whole by creating a new area of opportunity.

7 0
2 years ago
Passage of the Habeas Corpus Act (1679) meant that people could no longer be?
gregori [183]
Imprisoned without just cause. 
7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following policy positions is most associated with the liberal political ideology in the US?
    15·1 answer
  • What was the outcome of the second treaty of fort laramie?
    14·1 answer
  • 4 Clause that stated 3/5 of the slave population would be counted to determine representation in the US House of
    14·1 answer
  • How did the establishment of Israel affect the Middle East?
    11·1 answer
  • Do the Jim Crow Laws have an impact today? Why or why not?
    8·1 answer
  • Describe the actions
    15·1 answer
  • In what way did Mexicans contribute to the American war effort during World War I?
    12·1 answer
  • Drive to reform the railroad industry in Texas was led by which group
    8·1 answer
  • Why do you think the olmec and Zapotec civilizations developed along coastal areas?
    13·1 answer
  • Which factors are considered when deciding how to make goods and services? Choose three answers.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!