1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
adelina 88 [10]
3 years ago
6

The Constitution established three branches of government thata)share the same powers.

History
2 answers:
antoniya [11.8K]3 years ago
8 0
All the different branches of government have different powers. No branch is more powerful than the other. They do different things, however. B is correct.
vlabodo [156]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

  B) Have different powers.

Explanation:

  The three branches of government are legislative, executive and judicial. Each of these branches has different powers according to the U.S. Constitution. The reason why it is done is to limit the power of each branch between each other.

  I hope this answer helps you.

You might be interested in
What role did politics change global relations between countries in modern era?
AVprozaik [17]

Answer:The United States is today the only truly global power. Its military reach—whether on land, at sea, or in the air—extends to every point on the globe. Its economic prowess fuels world trade and industry. Its political and cultural appeal—what Joseph Nye has called soft power—is so extensive that most international institutions reflect American interests. America’s position in the world is unique—no other country in history has ever come close.

But is America’s exalted position sustainable? Militarily, the vast gap between the United States and everyone else is growing. Whereas defense spending in most other countries is falling, U.S. defense spending is rising rapidly. This year’s requested increase in defense spending is greater than the entire Chinese defense budget. Most remarkably, America can afford to spend more. Defense spending takes a smaller share of the U.S. gross domestic product than it did a decade ago—and even the Bush administration’s projected increases will produce an overall budget equal to only about 3.5 percent of GDP, about half of Cold War highs. There is little prospect of any country or group of countries devoting the resources necessary to begin competing with the United States militarily, let alone surpassing it.

Economically, the United States may not widen its edge over its competitors, but neither is it likely to fall behind. The U.S. economy has proven itself at least as adept as its major competitors in realizing the productivity gains made possible by information technology. Europe and Japan face severe demographic challenges as their populations rapidly age, creating likely labor shortages and severe budgetary pressures. China is modernizing rapidly, and Russia may have turned the corner, but their economies today are comparable in output to those of Italy and Belgium—and they have yet to develop a political infrastructure that can support sustained economic growth.

Which brings us to the issue of how to transform this unquestioned power into influence. Unless employed deftly, America’s military and economic superiority can breed resentment, even among its friends. A growing perception that Washington cares only about its own interests and is willing to use its muscle to get its way has fueled a worrisome gap between U.S. and European attitudes. European elites increasingly criticize the United States as being morally, socially, and culturally retrograde—especially in its perceived embrace of the death penalty, predatory capitalism, and fast food and mass entertainment. Europe has also begun to exercise diplomatic muscle in international institutions and other arenas, seeking to create new international regimes designed to limit America’s recourse to its hard power.

Explanation:

eptember 11 signaled the end of the age of geopolitics and the advent of a new age—the era of global politics. The challenge U.S. policymakers face today is to recognize that fundamental change in world politics and to use America’s unrivaled military, economic, and political power to fashion an international environment conducive to its interests and values.

For much of the 20th century, geopolitics drove American foreign policy. Successive presidents sought to prevent any single country from dominating the centers of strategic power in Europe and Asia. To that end the United States fought two world wars and carried on its four-decade-long Cold War with the Soviet Union. The collapse of the Soviet empire ended the last serious challenge for territorial dominion over Eurasia. The primary goal of American foreign policy was achieved.

During the 1990s, American foreign policy focused on consolidating its success. Together with its European allies, the United States set out to create, for the first time in history, a peaceful, undivided, and democratic Europe. That effort is now all but complete. The European Union—which will encompass most of Europe with the expected accession of 10 new members in 2004—has become the focal point for European policy on a wide range of issues. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization has evolved from a collective defense alliance into Europe’s main security institution. A new relationship with Russia is being forged.

Progress has been slower, though still significant, in Asia. U.S. relations with its two key regional partners, Japan and South Korea, remain the foundation of regional stability. Democracy is taking root in South Korea, the Philippines, Indonesia, and Taiwan. U.S. engagement with China is slowly tying an economically surging Beijing into the global economy.

5 0
2 years ago
To get equality for African Americans , MLK believed .....
Assoli18 [71]

MLK believed in the use of peaceful demonstrations, acting with love and calm.

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following best explains the difference between an absolute monarchy and a republic?
AnnZ [28]
Your answer would be A
4 0
3 years ago
How did Bias factor into the Sacco and Vanzetti Trial?
iris [78.8K]

Answer:

Sacco and Vanzetti were immigrants and anarchist during the Red Scare.

Explanation:

The Red Scare was a time in the early 1900s-1920s where American's feared communism/communist. Sacco and Vanzetti were easy targets because they were Italian immigrants and because their political beliefs were different    than what was mainstream. Even with doubts of their guilt and insufficient evidence to truly sentence them, they were sentenced to death. This may or may not be the answer you're looking for. Good Luck!

5 0
3 years ago
What does this sign mean?
Tomtit [17]

Answer:

It's a warning sign sir.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The firebombing of Tokyo
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following was not an outcome of the revolutions in Latin America? a)The colonial governments became authoritarian.
    11·2 answers
  • Did the attacks on Pearl Harbor unify the United States? (Who ever answers it I need help with an essay about it(5 paragraphs) o
    15·1 answer
  • How do they view the relationship between property and liberty?
    9·1 answer
  • In what ways did the war between france and Britain cause problems for the United states
    14·1 answer
  • Who wrote The Wealth of Nations, a book encouraging free markets, division of labor, and increased productivity?
    11·2 answers
  • The first agricultural revolution resulted in the
    12·2 answers
  • According to Jefferson, where does a person's rights come from?
    11·1 answer
  • Below is an image, featuring Uncle Sam
    10·2 answers
  • What capital resources<br> will you need?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!