1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alex787 [66]
4 years ago
8

Describe the verbal exchange that occurs between the 2 opposing armies in act 5 scene 1 in the story if the tragedy of julius ca

esar
History
1 answer:
KonstantinChe [14]4 years ago
4 0

X

Octavius and Anthony confer on the plains of Philippi.

Octavius is surprised to see that Brutus and Cassius' army has come to meet them, especially since Antony thought the enemy would stay put. Antony thinks the enemy is fronting: clearly Brutus and Cassius mean to appear courageous and brave, but Antony can see right through that.

Antony and Octavius set up a battle plan and are met by Brutus and Cassius—each with his army behind him—for a pre-battle parley, or negotiation.

As Brutus tries to get them to reason (and maybe avoid the fight), Antony and Octavius bait him. They claim Brutus' words are no good when they're accompanied by bad strokes (of the sword). Antony's like, remember that time you cried "Long live! Hail Caesar!" while you stabbed him in the heart? This is a sore point for Brutus.

There's some more back and forth, and folks get testy. Finally Octavius draws his sword and says he won't put it back again until he's dead or Caesar's 33 wounds (not that anybody's counting) are avenged.

You might be interested in
What does lyndon b johnson mean when he says freedom is not enough
sleet_krkn [62]

Answer:

LEGAL PROTECTION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS

Thus we have seen the high court of the country declare that discrimination based on race was repugnant to the Constitution, and therefore void. We have seen in 1957, and 1960, and again in 1964, the first civil rights legislation in this Nation in almost an entire century.

4 0
3 years ago
What has the "war on drugs" done to perpetuate crime myths?
anygoal [31]

War on drugs breaks through to perpetuate crime myths.America is trying a war on drugs for the last 100 years or so but it has not succeeded fully so far. They have been locking black <em>people in jail </em>perpetually but it is perhaps not helping the cause of war on drugs.This can be considered first myth.

Increasing the <em>severity of punishment</em> is also not helping the cause of war on drugs.This can be thought of second myth.US Criminal Justice system has changed over the years.

Domestic impact of war on drugs is profound.Its consequences do not stop at the border.Prohibition of drugs affects health,crime,corruption and violence.Moreover,these effects are self perpetuating.

8 0
4 years ago
Do you think Spain losing to England will affect their power in other parts of the world ? ​
Salsk061 [2.6K]

Answer:

Monarchs (kings and queen with supreme rule) in France, England, and Spain responded to the chaotic situation in Europe by consolidating their power. ... In Spain, the monarchs Ferdinand II of Aragon and Isabella of Castile laid the foundation for an immense empire by uniting several independent provinces.

Explanation:

hope it helps make me a brainlist please..........

8 0
4 years ago
Europe was at a time when the Reformation was flourishing. Henry VIII began to oppose Luther's reforms and wrote a booklet on th
aev [14]

Answer:

ok

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Who was Henry David Thoreau and why did he care about James Polk? What did he do about him? How does this tie into Transcendenta
Marina CMI [18]
Henry David Thoreau was a writer from the United States in the period of Transcendentalism. He cared about James Polk because James Polk was the president at the time and supported westward expansion which included the war against Mexico. He also hated Polk since Polk was a slave-owner even during his presidency, and Thoreau opposed slavery.

He wrote his famous work Civil Disobedience which talked harshly about slavery and about the Mexican-American war and it was widely read at the time since Thoreau was popular. He also held speeches and attended rallies to oppose government imperialist policies and spreading westward and similar things.

It ties into transcendentalism because he belonged to the movement and as such he claimed that the individual is important and that no government has the right to override someone's desire to be independent and act according to their conscience and to be free from the way that the government is corrupting people.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Consider what you have learned about the opportunities in Australia. In two to four sentences, describe the pros, or benefits, o
    7·1 answer
  • PLEASEE HELPP MEEE WITH NUMBER 5!!!!!!
    9·1 answer
  • John gave us the example of dealing with disorder when he addressed the problem of?
    10·1 answer
  • During the 1830s public servants and officials were widely perceived to be unqualified. What practice reinforced that perception
    14·2 answers
  • How was the industrial revolution impactful?
    5·1 answer
  • Which is not an effective question for launching a historical inquiry related to the US Civil War?
    11·1 answer
  • What do most right-wing voters generally tend to believe? Select three correct options
    6·2 answers
  • Thought industralization allowed people to buy more factory-made goods, it also led to what?
    15·1 answer
  • How have Supreme Court cases had the power of law in settling some civil rights issues? Cite a few specific examples of how indi
    11·1 answer
  • Which political theory allows for complete freedom of the individual and the absence government
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!