Answer:
LEGAL PROTECTION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
Thus we have seen the high court of the country declare that discrimination based on race was repugnant to the Constitution, and therefore void. We have seen in 1957, and 1960, and again in 1964, the first civil rights legislation in this Nation in almost an entire century.
War on drugs breaks through to perpetuate crime myths.America is trying a war on drugs for the last 100 years or so but it has not succeeded fully so far. They have been locking black <em>people in jail </em>perpetually but it is perhaps not helping the cause of war on drugs.This can be considered first myth.
Increasing the <em>severity of punishment</em> is also not helping the cause of war on drugs.This can be thought of second myth.US Criminal Justice system has changed over the years.
Domestic impact of war on drugs is profound.Its consequences do not stop at the border.Prohibition of drugs affects health,crime,corruption and violence.Moreover,these effects are self perpetuating.
Answer:
Monarchs (kings and queen with supreme rule) in France, England, and Spain responded to the chaotic situation in Europe by consolidating their power. ... In Spain, the monarchs Ferdinand II of Aragon and Isabella of Castile laid the foundation for an immense empire by uniting several independent provinces.
Explanation:
hope it helps make me a brainlist please..........
Henry David Thoreau was a writer from the United States in the period of Transcendentalism. He cared about James Polk because James Polk was the president at the time and supported westward expansion which included the war against Mexico. He also hated Polk since Polk was a slave-owner even during his presidency, and Thoreau opposed slavery.
He wrote his famous work Civil Disobedience which talked harshly about slavery and about the Mexican-American war and it was widely read at the time since Thoreau was popular. He also held speeches and attended rallies to oppose government imperialist policies and spreading westward and similar things.
It ties into transcendentalism because he belonged to the movement and as such he claimed that the individual is important and that no government has the right to override someone's desire to be independent and act according to their conscience and to be free from the way that the government is corrupting people.