Answer:
There is little publicity compared with Acts of Parliament which may mean people are unaware a ruling exists. Control by Parliament isn't always effective. Few affirmative resolutions exist and MP's are too busy to look over them, and controls are often not used anyway. There is a lack of scrutiny.
Explanation:
Answer:
1. What are some of the things the team at the Forensic Anthropology Lab is able to determine by studying bones?
Some of the things they are able to determine are what kind of prenatal environment they may have had, what kind of childhood they may have had, if it affected their stature, if it affected their dentition, their diet, and even their climate sometimes
2. Based on the individual’s remains discussed in the video, explain how Dr. Ann Ross and her team were able to determine the person died violently?
Due to the damage done to the skull—they found bullet holes. They then passed this information on to the authorities
3. Explain how researchers obtained information about the individual’s race, sex, height and connection with the local area?
They analyzed what they found. They measured, and compared the bones to find the individual’s race, sex, height, and location
.
Explanation:
Answer: False
Explanation:
The statement that "Under the US structure and operation of government each state can make, enforce and intrepret its own laws even if the laws are inconsistent with another state's laws or federal law" is false.
Even though state governments have the right to prescribe certain policy on education, taxation, commerce etc, it should be noted that such laws should not contradict the federal laws.
According to the Constitution of the United States, the federal law is being regarded as the supreme law and no.other state can contradict what it says.
Judicial restraint is the political theory that says courts shouldn't, unless absolutely required, issue rulings that broaden or alter the character of existing laws.
<h3>Justiciable constraint is exercised by whom?</h3>
A jurist (judge or justice) who upholds a philosophy of restraint can be described as one who considers democracy to have intrinsic, rather than just instrumental, value, that the judiciary is indeed the least powerful of the three branches of government, and who values stability and predictability in the lawmaking process.
<h3>Why do advocates of judicial restraint assert that judges are impervious to public sentiment?</h3>
They are freed from the strain of the outer world of public opinion since they do not have to worry about being reelected. In the end, the majority may not always be correct. The fact that the Founders established appointed judges and elected legislators is not by coincidence.
Learn more about Judicial restraint: brainly.com/question/29545866
#SPJ4
