Answer:
<u>The key details that contribute to the irony in the poem are the following:</u>
*The things that are considered no death, are the ones are not breathing or living.
*Even a pebble lies in a roadway, still it never experiences death. *No matter how grasses are cut, they still grow in the same place.
*Brooks, even though its flow is not that much, still you can see it come and go.
*Despite all these things that are not living, they do not fade nor die. But since a human is strong and wise, makes it the reason why it dies.
Explanation:
The irony in Louis Untermeyer's poem is given by the fact that those things that have no awareness of themselves, like pebbles and dust or sand and streams, live forever. Because that which is not alive cannot die. On the contrary, man, who is strong and intelligent, who is aware of himself and all the things around him and wants to live forever, eventually dies.
The best option to this question is D. Eurylochus is convincing the men to kill a cow.<span>Eurylochus said that
</span><span>"I'd rather die at sea, with one deep gulp of death,
than die by inches on this desolate island here!" *
Actually he was trying to convince the men to kill a cow.</span>
It is false that academic arguments should be written in first-person perspective. Nothing should be written in first-person perspective when it comes to academic writing.
Its probably B
he claims they are just people who can't make a significant difference if they act so they should just stand down
it's my guess anyways
Answer:
I agree hope u have a great day
Explanation:
peace D:
