I strongly believe the defendents of George Floyd's case should be tried seperatrely. It would be extremely unwise to have them tried them together. If merely two white men together have the ability to murder someone and (<em>almost</em>) get away with it, then together in court they could do far worse. White supremecy is unjust and segregated. In court, every detail matters, as it will affect the defendent's outcome. By allowing white supremecy to get the upper hand by doubling it (this by having two defendents), the facts will be shifted and altered tremendously to support the side of the defendent, and the defendents' outcome will be unjustified.
Hope this helps!
I love writing stuff like this, it feels good. Plus, this took me like 5 minutes :P
Well for one, a lot of people decided to do contactless voting and drop it off wherever they were accepting votes near you! They had voting machines open at some places but I’m sure it was very different than it usually is. Most likely it was distanced and you had to wear your mask. (I’m not old enough to vote yet, but I hope this helps!)
An appeal is the process in which cases are reviewed by a higher authority, where parties request a formal change to an official decision
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
By examining unique striations, scratches left behind on the bullet and weapon, individual fired rounds can be, but not always are, linked back to a specific weapon. These striations are due to the rifling inside the barrel of handguns. Rifling spins the bullet when it is shot out of the barrel to improve accuracy.
Answer:
Interactionist.
Explanation:
According to GOOGLE, <u>"Theories of Crime: Classical, Biological, Sociological, Interactionist. There are four basic theories of crime, and knowing and understanding each one is imperative for one to succeed in any legal profession."</u>
