Why would historians prefer primary sources over secondary sources?
1 answer:
Primary sources told an account of what actually happened because they were recorded from the actual event itself/saw the actual event
secondary sources (like our textbooks) arent 100% accurate because they are based off of the primary sources
You might be interested in
Answer:
B
Got it correct.
Explanation:
I think it’s D but if not it’s B
Probably D
<em>I dunno why but okay.</em>
Answer:
false
Explanation:
the answer is false
Protest is right I’m sorry if I’m wrong
