1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alenkasestr [34]
4 years ago
14

Why did the Egyptian term for "king" literally mean "great house?" Choose the best answer. Question 2 options: A) The term refer

red to the great pyramids. B) The pharaohs lived in big houses. C) A "great house" was a temple were pharaohs held religious ceremonies. D) The pharaohs family or "house" was the most powerful in Egypt.
History
2 answers:
vlabodo [156]4 years ago
8 0
<span>A "great house" was a temple were pharaohs held religious ceremonies</span>
Ganezh [65]4 years ago
8 0
The answer is C, A "Great house" was a temple where pharaohs held religious ceremonies and practices
 <span />
You might be interested in
Explain how the U.S. supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona has impacted society?
andriy [413]
The Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)<span> required (for the first time) that someone accused of a crime be </span>informed<span> of his or her constitutional rights prior to interrogation. This protected the rights of the accused, or the defendant, in two new ways: 1) It educated the person about relevant constitutional rights; and 2) It inhibited law enforcement officials from infringing those rights by applying the Exclusionary Rule to any testimony/incriminating statements the defendant made unless he intentionally waived his rights. </span>

<span>The Exclusionary Rule prohibits evidence or testimony obtained illegally or in violation of the constitution from being used against the defendant in court. </span>

<span>The </span>Miranda<span> ruling has been revised somewhat by subsequent Supreme Court decisions. On June 1, 2010, the Roberts' Court released the opinion for </span>Berghuis v. Thompkins,<span> 08-1470 (2010), which held a defendant must </span>invoke<span> his right to remain silent (by stating he wants to remain silent), rather than </span>waive<span>it (by explicitly agreeing to answer questions before interrogation). </span>
4 0
3 years ago
How did the Supreme Court change as a result of Ronald Reagan’s presindecy ?
ASHA 777 [7]

Answer:

The Reagan era of the 1980s is often remembered for the President’s pursuit of ending the Cold War and his legacy as the “Great Communicator.” But Reagan’s impact on the Supreme Court was also significant and still relevant today.During his eight years in office, President Reagan elevated a Chief Justice, had three nominations confirmed, one rejected and another nominee withdrawn from consideration in the Senate.

Reagan had signaled a desire to have an influence on the Court during the 1980 presidential campaign, and few will dispute that he did shape the Court’s future through his appointments.

The candidate said he would appoint a woman to the Supreme Court, and he also pledged to reverse the Roe v. Wade decision and any court decision that barred prayers in public schools.

President Reagan made good on his first promise when he nominated Arizona judge Sandra Day O’Connor to the Supreme Court. Reagan personally vouched that O’Connor’s views on abortion would be acceptable to conservatives.

O’Connor was unanimously approved by the Senate in a 99-0 vote on September 21, 1981, with one absent senator personally apologizing to the justice for not being present for the vote.

The rest of Reagan’s history with the Senate nomination process and the Supreme Court wasn’t as smooth. The President then decided to elevate a conservative Justice, William Rehnquist, to the position of Chief Justice in 1986 when Warren Burger retired. Rehnquist overcame liberal opposition in the Senate, and was appointed with a 65-33 vote.

Reagan’s next nomination came when he had to replace Rehnquist as an associate justice and he had two candidates to consider: Robert Bork and Antonin Scalia. He had put both judges on the District Of Columbia Circuit Appeals Court.

After the political debate over Rehnquist elevation to Chief Justice, there was much less political attention given to the eventual nominee: Scalia. Scalia, like O’Connor, received a unanimous confirmation to the Court on the same day that Rehnquist’s elevation was approved, despite having a more conservative record than Rehnquist.

Explanation:

Hope this is what you were looking for

4 0
4 years ago
What public facility had been separated by race in 1896 and caused the Brown court case to occur in 1954? A. Train cars B. Housi
mylen [45]
The answer would be c. Schools
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP YOU CAN HAVE 100 POINTS
Yuri [45]

Answer:

it helps by giving to the needy and always find the way to over come allof the rules including all of the broken laws

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Which major river became the western boundary of quebec under the quebec act?
Kobotan [32]

B The Mississippi River


4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Spanish begin conquest of mexico cause and effect
    9·1 answer
  • Where did Jefferson go during the revolutionary war
    15·1 answer
  • What do you understand by the term "HISTORY"?
    11·2 answers
  • Group had conflicts with silver miners over land and water rights?
    8·1 answer
  • The colonists of Latin America supported supported the idea of obeying rulers who were thousands of miles away.
    5·2 answers
  • Who surrendered on April 26, 1797?
    9·1 answer
  • One aspect of the Soviet Union’s foreign policy following World War II was to (5 points)
    6·1 answer
  • Introduced during Lamar’s presidency, red backs were ___________.
    12·2 answers
  • Can someone plz help me?
    5·2 answers
  • Purchasing stock on credit is called
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!