This is an opinion question, which means there is no wrong answer. Answer it however you would like.
I would say they are more believable if whoever has created the fake story hasn’t included any outrageous and nonrealistic details, since true stories are sometime so unbelievable because of the randomness of them.
Answer:
Go and click on the invitation bar and you can find an option written as " search friends ". Then it's easy to find that unknown user if you're pretty fond of his/her username and DP ( display picture ).
Explanation:
i asked a friend and we came up with this answer i don't know if it's right I've never tried to look up someone so try it out and see if it works if not ill try again
First person uses I, me, myself,etc. Rewrite the story as if the Wolf is explaining it. :)
Answer:
C) It summarizes the main topic of the essay.
Explanation:
Hope this helps! Pls give brainliest!
In this excerpt, we can read the conclusion of Victor Frankenstein about science: in the 19th century, scientists pursue their studies at any personal or moral cost:
"With a confusion of ideas only to be accounted for by my extreme youth and my want of a guide on such matters, I had retrod the steps of nowledge along the paths of time and exchanged the discoveries of recent inquirers for the dreams of forgotten alchemists. Besides, I had a contempt for the uses of modern natural philosophy. It was very different when the masters of the science sought immortality and power; such views, although futile, were grand; but now the scene was changed. The ambition of the inquirer seemed to limit itself to the annihilation of those visions on which my interest in science was chiefly founded. I was required to exchange chimeras of boundless grandeur for realities of little worth.
Such were my reflections during the first two or three days of my residence at Ingolstadt, which were chiefly spent in becoming acquainted with the localities and the principal residents (..)"
When the objective of the science experiments is only the recognition, the need for making something original and spectacular, to be regarded by other scientists the results could be terrible. For example, the creation of the poor monster of Frankenstein story.
