1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Strike441 [17]
2 years ago
5

What might have happened if the National Government could only legislate based on what is specifically in the Constitution?

History
1 answer:
EastWind [94]2 years ago
8 0
The amount of territory the US currently has would have been completely different if the national government could only legislate based on what is written in the constitution.

A perfect example of this is the power to purchase land/territories from other countries. This was first done by Thomas Jefferson with the Louisiana Purchase of 1803. The US Constitution does not say that the president has the power to buy land from other countries. However, Jefferson said that this power was "implied" by the Constitution.

This idea of an implied power greatly changed the presidency/national government. Several presidents after Jefferson would follow his lead by making deals with countries for territory.

If it wasn't for this concept of implied powers, the US may not have grown to the 50 states we know it as today.
You might be interested in
What kind of poster would motivate someone to join the army
Leokris [45]
A poster describing why it would be good and use the guilt trip it’s is your country to protect ur family and but a solider pointing
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What year was the Enabling Act passed? How did it give Hitler control of Germany?
Phoenix [80]

Answer:

1933

Explanation:

The act passed in both the Reichstag and Reichsrat on 23 March 1933, and was signed by President Paul von Hindenburg later that day.

4 0
2 years ago
I have this question. If you can answer it, answer it. If you can't, whatever. Anyway, how did Europe attempt to reestablish sta
Gelneren [198K]

Answer:

Imperial monopolies provided peace and stability

Explanation:

The disintegration of the Roman empire freed Europe from rule by a single power. Imperial monopolies provided peace and stability, but by seeking to preserve the status quo also tended to stifle experimentation and dissent.

6 0
3 years ago
Which argument led the untied states to use the the atomic bomb during worls was two
luda_lava [24]
<span>the invasion of Japan that cost tens of thousands of American lives. </span>
7 0
3 years ago
How Did Feudalism in Japan Form?
kap26 [50]
Feudalism formed with the gaining strength of the Shogunate. Samurai became a vital part of Japan, and people pledged their life to farms in exchange for protection.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did spanish american cities differ from those of europe?
    9·1 answer
  • The Montgomery Bus Boycott was based on the principle of
    13·2 answers
  • How to checks and balances in the constitution control the powers of government and lead to the development of democratic govern
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is correct regarding wills?
    12·1 answer
  • in a paragraph, evaluate the social changes women experienced on the home front as a result of World War I. Discuss both the har
    15·2 answers
  • Which best states why the Mughal Empire was considered a good example of multiculturalism?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT true about the Plains Indians? Question 6 options: They would not embrace European technology and
    12·1 answer
  • At Auschwitz, what happens to the children, elderly, and sick?
    5·1 answer
  • CAN SOMEONE HELP ME PLS??
    15·1 answer
  • 1. Kailan pumirma ang Pilipinas sa CEDAW?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!