Yes because back then, India was a colony of England and basically owned by a company called the East India company with military enforcement. The people had no representation and also were forced to pay taxes such as the salt tax that ghandi famously went against during the salt March.
Likewise, the united states back then was also a colony of India and had no representation as well as had to pay taxes from laws such as the stamp act. Their values in fighting for independence and free reign were very similar. So yes.
It is "<span>Dissonance was placed on the "weak" beat."
</span>
<span>the government in such a case might have become an autocracy. An autocratic state is defined as one in which all the governing powers are concentrated in the hands of one individual without leaving any scope for checks and balances for administering the state.</span>
B.homeowners' association dues
