Monks were generally more solitary and disconnected from the Laypeople they lived in a self sufficient community and were generally tied to that area, whereas Friars works closely with the laypeople relied on them more heavily f and were also allowed to travel around a wider area than the monks.
The descriptions and the category that they best describe regarding the eastern and western empires are:
Western Empire:
- Closer to invaders.
- Fewer resources.
- Weaker defenses.
Eastern Empire:
- More diverse.
- Closer to trade routes.
<h3>What were some differences between the Western and Eastern empire?</h3>
The Eastern Roman empire was able to last much longer than the Western empire because they were closer to trade routes. This gave them more resources and made them more diverse.
The Western empire had fewer resources which meant that they could not afford stronger defenses which was made worse by the fact that they were closer to invaders.
Find out more on the Western and Eastern empires at brainly.com/question/18698187
#SPJ1
Answer: Royal court spent too much. France was too indepted. France supported American independence against the British (also expensive) and lost its colony New France (Treaty of Paris, 1763). Immediately before the revolution poverty was extreme because of the climate (harsh winter).
Explanation: There were many external factors that worsened condition of common people in France (the Third state).
