The assignment wants a personal answer about your view of the headmaster's work and sport at your school. In that case, I can't write your answer, but I'll help you do that.
<h3>Response structure</h3>
- Show the changes that have taken place in the school in relation to sport.
- Emphasize whether these changes were beneficial or harmful.
- Show how the school headmaster was one of those responsible for the change.
- Point out how the director worked to bring about these changes.
This answer will depend on your analysis of your school and how the sport is established in it. You can talk to students and staff to strengthen this analysis.
Learn more about sports at the link:
brainly.com/question/1744272
#SPJ1
Answer: The answer would be A, he believed being imprisoned (even if only for a single night) merely kept his body in place. His mind was still free and imprisonment only further fueled his philosophical thinking, if you can call it that.
Explanation:
<u>The correct answer is A. What proof the tipster is able to provide.</u>
The reason why it's anonymous is probably because <em>the person providing the information doesn't feel comfortable providing their identity</em>. That's why we have so many tip lines that assure us we won't be asked for our names, information about where we live or even how we know what we know. All they care about is the information we provide and the accuracy of it.
Hence the correct answer can't be C or D. Just imagine what would happen to the tipster if they are quoted or exposed. They want the crime to stop but they don't want to be harmed for being the people talking about it.
In order to stop the crime or expose it, it is<u><em> necessary</em></u> for the reporter to have <em>concrete evidence</em> of it. Without proof, the reporter won't be able to check if the tip is true. His reputation is also undermined if what he publishes turns out to be fake, so proof is very important.
Answer B it's also incorrect because the <em>intention </em>of the tipster should be <em>irrelevant</em>. Also by stating why they want to talk, they'd be revealing who they are to the criminals (or at least give them an idea) and they wouldn't remain anonymous anymore.
An oxymoron is contradicting words (deafening silence, jumbo shrimp, etc), a paradox is contradicting ideas (I must be cruel to be kind)