Answer:
The correct answer is option A.
Explanation:
In the time of recession expansionary policy is required to boost the economy. An expansionary fiscal policy such as a reduction in tax will be helpful. A tax cut will cause an increase in disposable income. This will cause aggregate demand to rise. Consequently, output and employment will increase.
Similarly, in times of inflation, a contractionary policy will be required to eliminate inflationary pressures. A decrease in government spending would lead to a decrease in aggregate demand. This will cause the price level to get reduced.
Thus an economist would recommend tax cuts in case of recession and reduction in government spending in case of inflation.
<u>Answer:</u>$0
<u>Explanation:</u>
Hansel and Gretel receive $600 as house rent allowance and they pay the same $600 towards the rent for their stay in the manager's apartment. If they live in a different building they would only pay $500 then they could save $100 which is the opportunity cost lost by them.
They do not have a gross income as the income and allowance are equal there is no gross income. They cannot even move on to other building as per the job agreement they have to stay at the manager's house which makes it impossible for them to earn gross income when in this job agreement.
Answer:
animated and cute animals antics
Explanation:
It will go viral by little animation and those cute animals moments because everyone loves animals they are very cute and funny animals moments also so it will go viral
Answer:
FCF years 1 is $43,000
NPV is $13,300
Explanation:
The free cash flow for the first year=net income+depreciation-Capital exp
net income is $13,000
depreciation is $30,000
capital exp for the first year is nil
the free cash flow=$13,000+$30,000+$0=$43,000
FCF year zero=-$90,000
the FCF for year1 applies to years 2 and 3 as well
NPV=-$90,000+$43,000/(1+12%)^1+$43,000/(1+12%)^2+$43,000/(1+12%)^3=
$13,278.74
The closest option is $13,300
Given:
<span>Fact 1: During contract negotiations, BB’s sales representative promised that the system was “A-1” and “perfect.”
</span><span>Fact 2: The written contract, which the parties later signed, disclaimed all warranties, express and implied.
</span><span>Fact 3: After installation the computer produced only random numbers and letters, rather than the desired accounting information
The express warranty is given in Fact 1 where the Sales Rep promised that the system was "A-1" and "perfect". There is a breach in express warranty here IF the written contract also expresses the same promises.
However, the written contract </span>disclaimed all warranties, express and implied. AND BOTH PARTIES SIGNED THIS CONTRACT. It implies that the buyer has read through the contract and has agreed with what is written in the contract. Thus, they can't file a suit against BB for breaching an express warranty since the written and signed contract has already disclaimed all warranties.
