In addition to numerous congressional acts that focus more on national regulation, laws have been created that affect the practice of home mortgage lending at a community or neighborhood level. For example, laws have been enacted to prevent lenders from avoiding certain neighborhoods without regard to the merits of the individual loan applications, a practice more commonly referred to as redlining
The Confiscation Act, which would have allowed the federal government to seize property, including slave property, being used to assist the Confederate insurrection, was one of the wartime measures that the Senate debated during its special session from July 4 to August 6, 1861. The final bill was approved by the Senate on August 5, 1861, by a vote of 24 to 11, and President Lincoln signed it into law the following day. Although this bill had symbolic value, it had no bearing on the uprising or the talks during the war. Every American was able to purchase any property up to 160 acres of free federal land thanks to a congress statute from 1862. The process of purchasing a homestead consists mostly of three steps. The federal government was authorized in early 1962.
Learn more about congressional acts from
brainly.com/question/26521801
#SPJ4
Personal injury protection covers injury caused to any one by our mistake.Property damage on the other hand covers damage caused to someone's property.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Corporal damage security is the protection that covers injuries sustained. While resources harm accident insurance covers the damages caused to other people's property.
Personal injury protection covers injury irrespective of the fact that who made the accident. For example, If a passenger is injured by the driver in an accident then that driver can be held for the medical expenses.
Property destruction responsibility insurance covers damage to someone else's property, it does not cover damages to our own property.It includes property like house,car,office,fences,lamp post ,telephone poles.
Judicial restraint is the political theory that says courts shouldn't, unless absolutely required, issue rulings that broaden or alter the character of existing laws.
<h3>Justiciable constraint is exercised by whom?</h3>
A jurist (judge or justice) who upholds a philosophy of restraint can be described as one who considers democracy to have intrinsic, rather than just instrumental, value, that the judiciary is indeed the least powerful of the three branches of government, and who values stability and predictability in the lawmaking process.
<h3>Why do advocates of judicial restraint assert that judges are impervious to public sentiment?</h3>
They are freed from the strain of the outer world of public opinion since they do not have to worry about being reelected. In the end, the majority may not always be correct. The fact that the Founders established appointed judges and elected legislators is not by coincidence.
Learn more about Judicial restraint: brainly.com/question/29545866
#SPJ4
Bribery is the act of giving, or offering something to get something in return whilst extortion is The practice of obtaining something (especially Money) through force or threats.
