How did king george's feelings toward the colonies change after the Boston assacre

History

1 answer:

Shkiper50 [21]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

The "Tea Party" happened in 1770. The Americans threw about $1 million dollars worth of tea into the harbor over the tax placed on the tea. They (Samuel Adams in particular) wanted to send the message "taxation without representation is intolerable."

King George was not particularly happy with his Massachusetts colony prior to the dumping of the tea, but afterward his anger was almost unbridled.

In retribution King George ordered all governors be replaced by English Governor Generals. He also ordered the court system, particularly the maritime courts, be presided over by English judges. And although these acts were meant to apply to all 13 colonies, nowhere were they more obvious than Massachusetts which the King considered the root of all disharmony. He was probably right on that point.

You might be interested in

Why did the u.s. avoid involvement in wwii until december 1941? why was the pearl harbor attack such a shock to the u.s? america

Rainbow [258]

They wanted to stay nurtral to make more money.

3 0

3 years ago

How has the Supreme Court interpreted the fifth amendment protection against self

Nesterboy [21]

Answer:

What does the fifth amendment protect?

The Fifth Amendment protects the right to avoid incriminating yourself. A defendant can plead the Fifth Amendment if a lawyer asks a question that the defendant would incriminate himself or herself by answering truthfully.

Explanation:

Constitutional Issue ★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★

The Fifth Amendment of the Constitution guarantees that “no person . . . shall be

compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself. . . .” This right was made

part of the Bill of Rights to prevent a tyrannical government from forcing accused persons

to confess to crimes they may or may not have committed. Miranda’s case before the

Supreme Court was based on this Fifth Amendment protection. The Court accepted the

case in order to explore and clarify certain problems arising from earlier decisions related

to the rights of individuals taken into police custody. The precise question that the Court

explored was under what circumstances an interrogation may take place so that a confession made during the interrogation would be constitutionally admissible in a court of law.

★★★★★★★

5 0

3 years ago

Which of the following guarantees an individual’s right to receive legal representation if the defendant cannot afford to pay fo

yan [13]

Answer:

The Sixth Amendment to the Constitution requires the assistance of counsel for the accused in "all criminal prosecutions."

Explanation: The Sixth Amendment, which is a part of the Bill of Rights guarantees certain protections for the accused.

3 0

3 years ago

A land mass surrounded by water on three sides

a_sh-v [17]